Within the depth-psychology corpus, spirituality emerges not as a settled category but as a contested site where authentic transformation and defensive avoidance perpetually threaten to exchange places. The literature divides, broadly, along two axes. The first concerns spirituality’s relationship to psychological work: Masters, Welwood, and Mathieu converge on the diagnostic that spiritual practice is chronically vulnerable to becoming a mechanism of evasion — what Welwood coined ‘spiritual bypassing’ — whereby practitioners deploy meditative detachment, positive-thinking frameworks, or nondual rhetoric to sidestep unprocessed emotional and shadow material. The second axis concerns definition: Kurtz and Ketcham distinguish spirituality from both religion and therapy, locating it in an irreducible openness to what exceeds the self; Dennett maps James’s ‘religiosity’ and Jung’s ‘numinous’ onto addiction recovery; Benda situates spirituality as a transpersonal quality common to all humanity, in contrast to the boundary-marking function of institutional religion. Moore, writing from a soul-care perspective, warns that when spirituality loses contact with soul it hardens into rigidity and authoritarianism. Simondon, arriving from outside the clinical tradition, grounds spirituality in the individual’s felt sense of surpassing its own limits. The animating tension throughout is between spirituality as integral embodiment — encompassing shadow, emotion, and the personal — and spirituality as a flight from precisely those dimensions.