Within the depth-psychology corpus, YHWH functions as far more than a divine proper name: it operates as a charged symbol for the paradoxical, morally ambivalent ground of the Western God-image. Jung, followed closely by Edinger, treats YHWH as the defining exemplar of a deity who harbors a ‘moral antinomy accompanied by an almost complete lack of reflection’ — a creator who generates Satan, forgets his own shadow, and projects evil onto humanity. This Jungian reading stands in productive tension with Armstrong’s historical-theological account, in which Yahweh evolves from a territorial storm god and tribal war deity into the transcendent, compassionate source championed by the Hebrew prophets. Abram approaches YHWH from a phenomenological angle, reading the unpronounceable name as an index of the invisible atmospheric medium — breath, wind, ruach — that predates abstract monotheism. Kabbalistic interpreters, surveyed by both Armstrong and Pollack, treat the Tetragrammaton not as a personal name but as a cosmogonic formula encoding the structure of creation through the four letters. The tension between YHWH as an anthropomorphic, historically conditioned deity and En Sof as the utterly impersonal Godhead defines a central fault line in the corpus, one that Edinger maps onto the Jungian problem of the unindividuated Self. The term thus anchors discussions of theodicy, incarnation, the privatio boni controversy, and the individuation of the divine.