Within the depth-psychology corpus, YHWH functions as far more than a divine proper name: it operates as a charged symbol for the paradoxical, morally ambivalent ground of the Western God-image. Jung, followed closely by Edinger, treats YHWH as the defining exemplar of a deity who harbors a 'moral antinomy accompanied by an almost complete lack of reflection' — a creator who generates Satan, forgets his own shadow, and projects evil onto humanity. This Jungian reading stands in productive tension with Armstrong's historical-theological account, in which Yahweh evolves from a territorial storm god and tribal war deity into the transcendent, compassionate source championed by the Hebrew prophets. Abram approaches YHWH from a phenomenological angle, reading the unpronounceable name as an index of the invisible atmospheric medium — breath, wind, ruach — that predates abstract monotheism. Kabbalistic interpreters, surveyed by both Armstrong and Pollack, treat the Tetragrammaton not as a personal name but as a cosmogonic formula encoding the structure of creation through the four letters. The tension between YHWH as an anthropomorphic, historically conditioned deity and En Sof as the utterly impersonal Godhead defines a central fault line in the corpus, one that Edinger maps onto the Jungian problem of the unindividuated Self. The term thus anchors discussions of theodicy, incarnation, the privatio boni controversy, and the individuation of the divine.
In the library
20 passages
YHWH is inclined to find the cause of evil in men, but he evidently represents a moral antinomy accompanied by an almost complete lack of reflection.
Jung argues that YHWH embodies a fundamental moral self-contradiction, projecting evil onto humanity while remaining unconscious of his own paradoxical nature as creator of both Satan and the righteous.
Jung, C.G., Collected Works Volume 18: The Symbolic Life, 1976thesis
YHWH is inclined to find the cause of evil in men, but he evidently represents a moral antinomy accompanied by an almost complete lack of reflection. For example, he seems to have forgotten that he created his son Satan.
Edinger excerpts Jung's letter to establish that YHWH's moral blindness — creating Satan and forgetting it — is the central psychological problem requiring the development of a new God-image.
Edinger, Edward F., The New God-Image: A Study of Jung's Key Letters Concerning the Evolution of the Western God-Image, 1996thesis
The Holy Spirit is one, a complexio oppositorum, in contrast to YHWH after the separation of the divine opposites symbolized by God's two sons, Christ and Satan.
Edinger, following Jung, posits that the Holy Spirit represents a higher synthesis beyond YHWH's unresolved duality of good and evil, embodied in the opposed figures of Christ and Satan.
Edinger, Edward F., The New God-Image: A Study of Jung's Key Letters Concerning the Evolution of the Western God-Image, 1996thesis
A Midrash says that the Shofar is still sounded on the Day of Atonement to remind YHWH of his act of injustice towards Abraham (by compelling him to slay Isaac) and to prevent him from repeating it.
Edinger cites a Midrashic tradition to substantiate the Jungian claim that YHWH's relationship to justice is coercive and unreliable, requiring human ritual to keep divine injustice in check.
Edinger, Edward F., The New God-Image: A Study of Jung's Key Letters Concerning the Evolution of the Western God-Image, 1996thesis
Unlike YHWH, En Sof had no documented name; 'he' is not a person. Indeed it is more accurate to refer to the Godhead as 'It.'
Armstrong delineates the Kabbalistic distinction between the personal, scripturally documented YHWH and the wholly impersonal, nameless En Sof, marking a radical theological departure from biblical personalism.
Even in the written narratives of the Bible, YHWH typically manifests himself in atmospheric phenomena, from the rains that flood the earth for forty days in Genesis, to the tumultuous whirlwind that addresses Job.
Abram argues that YHWH's consistent manifestation in atmospheric and meteorological phenomena suggests the deity's pre-alphabetic identity as the encompassing, invisible medium of breath and wind.
Abram, David, The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, 1996supporting
The letters do not form a 'name' in the human sense of a label that stands for a person, but rather they depict a formula. And that formula describes the process of creation.
Pollack draws on Kabbalistic interpretation to argue that YHWH (the Tetragrammaton) is not a personal label but a cosmogonic formula encoding the structural logic of creation through the four elements.
Pollack, Rachel, Seventy-Eight Degrees of Wisdom: A Tarot Journey to Self-Awareness, 1980supporting
Unlike the pagan deities, Yahweh was not in any of the forces of nature but in a realm apart. He is experienced in the scarcely perceptible timbre of a tiny breeze in the paradox of a voiced silence.
Armstrong identifies a decisive theological distinction in the Elijah narrative: Yahweh's transcendence of natural forces marks a break from pagan immanentism toward a more rarefied, paradoxical divine presence.
Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993supporting
Second Isaiah took this one step further and declared that Yahweh was the only God. In his rewriting of Israelite history, the myth of...
Armstrong traces the historical emergence of strict monotheism to the Babylonian exile, when the destruction of the Temple forced a reconceptualization of Yahweh as the sole universal deity.
Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993supporting
Yahweh accused the other gods of failing to meet the social challenge of the day. He represented the modern compassionate ethos of the prophets, but his divine colleagues had done nothing to promote justice.
Armstrong shows Yahweh actively displacing El and the divine council, positioning him as the champion of prophetic social ethics over against obsolete mythological deities.
Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993supporting
They liked the images of the 'glory' (kavod) of YHWH and of the Holy Spirit, which were constant reminders that the God that we experience does not correspond to the essence of the divine reality.
Armstrong notes that Rabbinic thought preserved epistemic humility by insisting that YHWH's kavod and Spirit are only partial, mediated traces of a divine reality that wholly exceeds human experience.
Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993supporting
Yahweh began as a highly personalized deity with passionate human likes and dislikes. Later he became a symbol of transcendence, whose thoughts were not our thoughts.
Armstrong charts Yahweh's theological evolution from an anthropomorphic, emotionally reactive tribal deity to a symbol of radical transcendence surpassing all human categories.
Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993supporting
Yahweh, you have seduced me and I am seduced, You have raped me and I am overcome … Then there seemed to be a fire burning in my heart, imprisoned in my bones.
Armstrong cites Jeremiah's tortured prophetic experience as evidence of Yahweh's coercive, erotically ambivalent power — an encounter with the mysterium terribile that overwhelms individual will.
Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993supporting
Some Israelites appear to have thought that Yahweh had a wife, like the other gods: archaeologists have recently unearthed inscriptions dedicated 'To Yahweh and his Asherah.'
Armstrong presents archaeological evidence that popular Israelite religion attributed to Yahweh a consort, revealing the ongoing struggle between the exclusive monotheistic program and residual polytheistic practice.
Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993supporting
A volatile power once propitiated as a local storm god came to be generalized, by one tribe of nomadic herders, into the capricious power of the encompassing atmosphere itself.
Abram proposes a phenomenological genealogy of Israelite monotheism in which YHWH's universalization reflects an expanded sensory awareness of the invisible atmospheric medium shared by all living beings.
Abram, David, The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, 1996supporting
The unpronounceable tetragram YHWH: the being identified with what is and will be, with 'signifiance'
Benveniste's preface links YHWH's unpronounceable ontological name — 'I am what I am' — to a structural linguistic theory of signifiance, treating the divine name as the paradigm case of meaning that neither declares nor conceals but signifies.
The true pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton was said to be known only by the high priests of ancient Israel. As the true pronunciation would give one a powerful link to God, it was believed to hold extraordinary magical power.
Place situates the Tetragrammaton within esoteric magical tradition, where the authentic vocalization of YHWH constitutes a direct ontological link to the divine and is therefore restricted to initiated priestly authority.
Place, Robert M., The Tarot: History, Symbolism, and Divination, 2005supporting
During the biblical period, YHWH had eventually triumphed over the ancient goddesses of Canaan and their erotic cults. But as Kabbalists struggled to express the mystery of God, the old mythologies reasserted themselves.
Armstrong demonstrates that Kabbalistic theosophy, in developing the feminine Shekinah and phallic Yesod, effectively reintroduced suppressed goddess symbolism into the monotheistic YHWH tradition under new mythological guise.
Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993supporting
The Hebrew lying beneath the Greek translation is (rendered literally) 'I, I am he' (Isa. 43:25; 51:12) and 'I am YHWH' (Isa. 45:19).
Thielman's exegetical note establishes that the Johannine ego eimi formula draws directly on the Deutero-Isaianic 'I am YHWH' declaration, linking Christological divine self-identification to the Tetragrammaton tradition.
Frank S. Thielman, Theology of the New Testament: A Canonical and Synthetic Approach, 2005aside
Despite his terrifying otherness, Yahweh can speak and Isaiah can answer. Again, this would have been inconceivable to the sages of the Upanishads.
Armstrong marks the distinctively dialogical character of the Yahweh encounter as theologically unique: unlike Brahman-Atman, YHWH's otherness is paired with a capacity for personal address that defines Western religious experience.