Virginity occupies a remarkably capacious position in the depth-psychology corpus, ranging far beyond its conventional theological meaning of physical chastity. The tradition divides broadly into three registers. The first is theological-cosmological: John of Damascus and the Philokalia treat virginity as humanity’s primordial condition, a supranatural grace that preceded the fall and to which ascetic practice aspires to return. The second is archetypal-mythological: Jung’s heirs — Neumann, Woodman, Berry, Greene — reinterpret the virgin as a psychological structure. For Woodman, virginity names an inner wholeness that is ‘one-in-herself,’ independent of patriarchal possession; the ‘armed virgin’ achieves consciousness through ravishment rather than avoiding it. For Berry, virginity becomes an aesthetic-imaginal principle — the resistant, self-enclosed integrity of the image itself. Greene reads it through Virgo and the kore myth as the paradoxical condition of the ‘free woman,’ where chastity and erotic autonomy are not opposites but expressions of the same inner sovereignty. The third register, represented by Rank, is psychoanalytic: virginity as a cultural sublimation of the mother-ideal, the physiological form of a wish to return. Across these registers, the central tension is whether virginity names a renunciatory ideal or a dynamic, generative quality of psychic wholeness.