Vegetation enters the depth-psychology corpus as one of its most layered symbolic territories, operating simultaneously as a cosmological category, a mythological protagonist, and a psychological metaphor. The dominant strand, running through Frazer, Harrison, Jung, Neumann, Eliade, Otto, Bly, and Campbell, treats vegetation as the primary medium through which archaic humanity encoded the mystery of cyclical death and renewal. Harrison’s pivotal move—replacing ‘Vegetation Spirit’ with ‘Eniautos-Daimon’—signals the theoretical tension: is vegetation symbolism reducible to agricultural magic, or does it index something far broader, namely the entire rhythm of cosmic waxing and waning? Jung answers by reading grain and wine as symbols with a fourfold depth, yoking agricultural fact to the dying-and-resurgent god. Neumann situates earth-and-vegetation symbols within the Great Mother archetype, where the green world figures the fecund, devouring, and regenerative feminine. Bly sharpens this by noting the counter-intuitive ancient assignment of vegetation to the male principle, making the sacrificed boy-god the literal embodiment of seasonal dying. Otto resists reductive vegetation-magic readings of Dionysus, insisting on the god’s irreducible mythic stature. A secondary, clinical strand appears in the corpus—active imagination producing rotten vegetation as an image of neglected inner life, and empirical nature-therapy research treating vegetative scenery as a measurable restorative stimulus. These strands rarely speak to one another directly, yet together they reveal why vegetation persists as a compelling depth-psychological signifier: it bodies forth the very pulse of the unconscious.