The concept of the unlived life occupies a contested yet generative position across the depth-psychological corpus. Its primary axis of meaning concerns the psychic cost exacted when potential—whether of personality, vocation, creativity, or relational capacity—is foreclosed by socialization, fear, or neurotic adaptation. Otto Rank, cited by Yalom, provides a foundational formulation: the individual who protects against too-intensive living incurs guilt precisely on account of ‘the unused life, the unlived life in us.’ Von Franz sharpens this into a moral register, arguing that an unlived potential—especially toward consciousness—constitutes active destructiveness, both self-directed and toward others. Hollis maps the intergenerational transmission of the unlived life, demonstrating how parents routinely project foreclosed potentialities onto children, burdening the next generation with what was refused in themselves. Johnson approaches the unlived life therapeutically, arguing that Active Imagination and symbolic enactment can satisfy unlived potentials without requiring external realization. Liz Greene extends the concept astrologically and psychologically, attending to how a child inherits the ‘trapped soul’ of parental suppression. Together these writers establish unlived life as both a clinical phenomenon—manifesting in depression, projection, existential guilt, and midlife crisis—and a metaphysical one, tied to questions of individuation, mortality, and the soul’s authentic trajectory.