The Tripartite Model, as encountered across the depth-psychology corpus, designates the division of a complex whole — most fundamentally the human psyche — into three distinct yet interacting parts. Its most consequential instantiation is Plato’s partition of the soul (psuche) in the Republic into the rational (logistikon), spirited (thumoeides), and appetitive elements, a schema that has proven foundational and contentious in equal measure. Hobbs, Lorenz, and Peterson each demonstrate that the significance of this model lies not merely in its structural elegance but in the power dynamics it encodes: the thumoeides, long overlooked or subordinated to reason, has attracted fresh scrutiny as critics discern in the tripartite arrangement a structural demotion of feeling and spirited agency. Peterson explicitly identifies the Platonic tripartite soul as a catastrophic misreading that inaugurated ‘the ages of repression.’ Hillman traces an alchemical variant through Paracelsus’s tria prima, which refounded alchemy on a tripartite cosmo-anthropology of body, soul, and spirit. In patristic and ascetic literature, Evagrius and the Philokalia preserve a tripartite soul whose three powers — intelligence, incensive, and desiring — become sites of both demonic assault and divine legislation. The model thus traverses ancient philosophy, Christian mysticism, and modern depth psychology, carrying throughout a persistent tension between hierarchical integration and the suppression of its non-rational members.