The term ‘tribe’ appears across the depth-psychology corpus in several distinct registers, each bearing its own analytical weight. At the sociological-anthropological level, scholars such as Vernant, Benveniste, and Turner examine tribe as a structural unit of collective organization — whether as an artificially constituted political body (the Cleisthenic reform tribes of Athens), a birth-based kinship group (the Indo-European *jāti/*zantu*), or a ritual community that may transcend ethnic and linguistic boundaries. Within depth psychology proper, the tribe functions as a carrier of collective psychic life: Jung observes the medicine-man as custodian of the tribe’s traditional lore, while von Franz identifies the king as incarnated bearer of a tribe’s ‘mystical life power.’ Armstrong’s reading of early Islam and Edinger’s treatment of ‘tribal monotheism’ foreground the tribe as the primary locus of sacred identity prior to universalist religious claims. Radin’s ethnographic work situates the Trickster myth within the living social fabric of Winnebago tribal culture, where law, war, and sacred authority are distributed across phratry structures. Estes and von Franz each invoke tribal membership as the ground of psychic belonging — the longing to hear one’s own tribe’s stories figures as an irreducible psychological need. The central tension in this corpus runs between tribe as a container of inherited, pre-individual symbolic life and tribe as a limitation the individuation process must ultimately transcend.