Transindividual

the psychical leads to an order of trans individual reality… the pre-individual reality associated with individuated living organisms is not segmented like them… when this reality is grasped within a new individuation initiated by the living being, it conserves a relation of participation that connects each psychical being to other psychical beings; the psychical is the nascent transindividual

Simondon defines the transindividual as the order of reality to which psychical individuation tends, identifying the psychical itself as the nascent form of transindividual being.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The collective is not a milieu for the individual but a set of participations in which it enters through this second individuation that choice is when it is expressed as a transindividual reality. The subject being can be conceived as a more or less perfectly coherent system of three successive phases of being: the pre-individual phase, the individuated phase, and… the transindividual phase

Simondon articulates the transindividual as the third ontogenetic phase, constituted through a second individuation that links individuated beings via the pre-individual charge they conserve.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Intra-individual integration is reciprocal with transindividual integration. The category of presence is also the category of the transindividual. A structure and a function exist both in individuals and from one individual to another, without them being able to be defined as merely external or internal.

Simondon establishes the transindividual as the structural-functional category of presence — the dimension through which intra-individual and inter-individual resonances are reciprocally constituted.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

too much individuality remains in the conception of the transindividual; the relation between the biological individual and the transindividual then can only intervene through a disindividuation of the individual; here, the error properly speaking is not one of anthropomorphism but of the individualization of the transindividual

Simondon warns against the cardinal error of conceiving the transindividual as a superior individuality, arguing that such individualization betrays the term’s properly relational and processual meaning.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we must distinguish between culture and transindividual reality; culture is neutral in a certain sense; it has to be polarized by the subject that calls itself into question; on the contrary, there is in the transindividual relation a requirement of the subject to be called into question by himself

Simondon draws a crucial distinction between culture — which is normatively neutral — and transindividual reality, which demands the subject’s radical self-interrogation as a constitutive condition.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

psychological individuality appears to be what is elaborated by elaborating transindividuality; this elaboration rests on two interconnected dialectics, one of which interiorizes the exterior, the other of which exteriorizes the interior… beyond the notion of the soul’s substantiality and also beyond the notion of the inexistence of any spiritual reality, there is the possibility of defining a transindividual reality.

Simondon positions transindividual reality as the properly philosophical alternative to both materialist and spiritualist accounts of the soul, grounding psychological individuality in its elaboration of transindividuality.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

to speak of the soul is to overly individualize and overly particularize the transindividual. The impression of surpassing individual limits and the opposite impression of exteriority that characterize the spiritual have a meaning and find the foundation of their unity of divergence in this pre-individual reality.

Simondon argues that spiritual experience — the sense of transcending individual limits — finds its genuine ontological foundation in pre-individual reality rather than in the individualized soul.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the being communicates with the world and with other individuated beings, discovering significations concerning which it does not know whether they are a priori or a posteriori. The discovery of these significations is a posteriori, for there must be an operation of individuation in order for these significations to appear

Simondon shows that the transindividual is the operative field within which signification is discovered through collective individuation, blurring the a priori / a posteriori distinction.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the associated charge of pre-individuality that constitutes the horizon of transindividual Being from which they stand out… the notions of potential charge, oriented tensions, supersaturation, and phase-shift, borrowed from thermodynamics, and the notion of the resonance internal to systems, intervene.

The editorial introduction frames transindividual Being as the horizon against which individuated forms stand out, underwritten by thermodynamic concepts of potential and phase-shift.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

is labor a structure, Collective Individuation and the Foundations of the Transindividual 339 or indeed a tension

Simondon interrogates the Marxist infrastructure concept within the broader project of grounding collective individuation and the transindividual, questioning whether labor constitutes a structure or a tension.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Emotion is a calling into question of the being in its individual aspect insofar it is the capacity to evoke an individuation of the collective that will overlap and link the individuated being. Emotion is incomprehensible according to the individual because it cannot find its root in the structures or functions of the individual qua individual

Simondon locates emotion at the threshold of transindividual individuation, identifying it as the affective modality through which the individual is called beyond itself toward collective genesis.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

there is not the psychological and the sociological, but there is the human, which, at the extreme limit and in rare situations, can split into the psychological and the sociological. Both psychology and sociology are two viewpoints Collective Individuation and the Foundations of the Transindividual 331 that fabricate their own object based on interiority or exteriority

Simondon critiques both psychology and sociology as derivative abstractions, positioning the transindividual as the properly human domain that precedes and exceeds their division.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Subjectivity and Signification; the Transindividual Character of Signification… The Central Operational Zone of the Transindividual: Theory of Emotion

The table of contents reveals Simondon’s systematic articulation of the transindividual across dimensions of signification, subjectivity, and the theory of emotion.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

relation, to the world and to the collective, is a dimension of individuation in which the individual participates based on pre-individual reality, which progressively individuates. Thus, psychology and the theory of the collective are tied together

Simondon links the theory of the collective directly to psychology through the shared ontogenetic ground of pre-individual reality, anticipating the transindividual framework.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the group is a syncrystallization of several individual beings, and it is the result of this syncrystallization that constitutes the group personality; the group personality is not introduced into individuals by the group

Simondon’s account of group individuation as syncrystallization supports the transindividual thesis by showing collective identity as emergent rather than pre-given.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the dark relational zone, that of the real collective, the ontogenesis of which seems to be thrust back into the unknowable. According to the attitude of sociological objectivity, to grasp the reality of groups as a fact is to come after the individuation that founds the collective.

Simondon identifies a methodological blind spot in both sociology and inter-psychology — each arrives only after collective individuation, missing the transindividual operation itself.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the individual amplifies itself into the collective. Information conserves the pre-individual within the individual.

Simondon’s endnotes confirm that transindividual amplification operates through information, which preserves pre-individual potential within and across individuated beings.

Simondon, Gilbert, Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information, 2020aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →