Transgenerational transmission names the processes by which the consequences of trauma, relational patterns, epigenetic marks, and psychological complexes pass across generational boundaries — from parent to offspring, and sometimes further. Within the depth-psychology corpus this term draws together strikingly disparate registers of inquiry. At the biological pole, Rachel Yehuda’s landmark epigenetic research on Holocaust survivors and their offspring demonstrates measurable methylation differences in the FKBP5 stress-regulatory gene, establishing a molecular substrate for what clinicians had long observed anecdotally. Gabor Maté and Tian Dayton bring the clinical-developmental perspective, tracing how parental trauma, addiction, and relational dysregulation are transmitted through attachment, modeling, and the biochemistry of prenatal exposure. Liz Greene, working from an archetypal-astrological framework, treats intergenerational transmission as the family curse made visible — a fate-pattern in which unresolved ancestral complexes impose themselves on successive generations. Stanislav Grof, by contrast, entertains the possibility of direct ancestral experience surfacing in altered states. Lanius and colleagues situate the phenomenon within trauma psychiatry, noting that the family operates simultaneously as buffer and as risk amplifier. The central tension across these positions concerns mechanism: whether transmission is primarily epigenetic, relational-behavioral, psychodynamic, or archetypal — a question that remains productively unresolved and constitutive of the field’s ongoing inquiry.