Totem Animal

What is essential in the totem is the idea of the archetypes… Most often these totem beings are half human, half animal; they are the ancestors. This whole experience is a memory of the time when man was half animal, half human: aljira or bugari.

Jung argues that the totem animal is the archetypal ancestral figure embodying the primordial psychic stratum before ego-differentiation, identified with the dreamtime world of the collective unconscious.

Jung, C.G., Dream Interpretation Ancient and Modern: Notes from the Seminar Given in 1936-1941, 2014thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the totem animals in real-ity a substitute for the father; and this tallies with the contradictory fact that, though the killing of the animal is as a rule forbidden, yet its killing becomes a festive occasion — the fact that it is killed and yet mourned.

Freud’s central thesis: the totem animal is a father-surrogate onto which Oedipal ambivalence is displaced, making the ritual killing and mourning the paradigm of the sacrificial act and the origin of religion.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The totem is indeed partly a father, but it never has a personal character, let alone that of the personal father. On the contrary, the whole point of the ritual is that the procreative spirit should be experienced as something remote and different, and yet as ‘belonging.’

Neumann critiques Freud’s personalistic reduction, arguing the totem animal functions as a transpersonal numinosum that initiation must render experienceable, not a disguised personal father.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

they will not hunt the totem animal or kill or eat it and, if it is something other than an animal, they refrain from making use of it in other ways… A totem animal that is found dead is mourned for and buried like a dead clansman.

Freud enumerates the totemic taboos — prohibition on killing, eating, touching, and naming — and the mourning of the dead totem as a clansman, establishing the social and ritual structure of totemism.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Freud has been able to show that these primitive peoples have an ambivalent attitude towards their totem… The totem is the object both of their love and their fear… the totemistic attitude still reappears in the mental life of the child.

Abraham confirms the psychoanalytic thesis that the totem animal encodes ambivalence — love and dread — and demonstrates its survival in the unconscious life of the contemporary child.

Abraham, Karl, Selected Papers on Psychoanalysis, 1927thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The totem animal is always the first, the original, ancestor. The next generation would be heroic animals or demi-gods… The primitive is sad, like a lost child, till he has a dream placing him with his totem animal. Then he is a child of God, a human being, he has a distinct fate.

Jung presents the totem animal clinically as the original ancestral spirit whose appearance in dream signals psychic placement within a transpersonal order and the beginning of a new life-epoch.

Jung, C.G., Dream Analysis: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1928-1930, 1984thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The primitive is sad, like a lost child, till he has a dream placing him with his totem animal. Then he is a child of God, a human being, he has a distinct fate. It is always a sign in dreams that now a level is reached where something is going to happen.

Jung identifies the totem animal’s appearance in dream as a threshold marker signaling the emergence of transformative unconscious content and a new creative or developmental epoch.

Jung, C.G., Dream Analysis: Notes of the Seminar Given in 1928-1930, 1984supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The totem animal protects and gives warning to members of its clan… The totem animal foretells the future to the loyal members of its clan and serves them as guide.

Freud catalogues the totemic religion’s positive functions — protection, warning, prophecy, and guidance — which the psychoanalytic reading will reinterpret as projections of paternal authority.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The totem-animal is in general the guardian and protector of its human counterpart, but the relation is strictly mutual; the animal depends on the man as the man on the animal.

Harrison establishes the reciprocal, mutually sustaining bond between totem animal and clan, illustrated through Intichiuma fertility ceremonies, countering purely projective or hierarchical accounts.

Harrison, Jane Ellen, Themis: A Study of the Social Origins of Greek Religion, 1912supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

children displace some of their feelings from their father on to an animal. Analysis is able to trace the associative paths along which this displacement passes — both the fortuitous paths and those with a significant content.

Freud grounds the totem-as-father thesis in clinical evidence from ‘Little Hans,’ demonstrating how Oedipal rivalry motivates displacement of ambivalence onto the animal figure.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

In the earliest times the sacrificial animal had itself been sacred and its life untouchable; it might only be killed if all the members of the clan participated in the deed and shared their guilt in the presence of the god.

Freud follows Robertson Smith in tracing sacrificial ritual to the totem’s original sacredness, where communal killing and shared guilt bind the clan through the sacred substance of the totem’s body.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Man in the totemistic stage rarely sets himself as individual over against his tribe; he rarely sets himself as man over against the world around him… He has not yet drawn the clear-cut outline that defines the conception kangaroo from that of man.

Harrison interprets totemism as a stage of participatory, pre-individuated consciousness in which boundaries between self, clan, and animal remain fluid, grounding the totem bond in felt rather than conceptual relations.

Harrison, Jane Ellen, Themis: A Study of the Social Origins of Greek Religion, 1912supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Totemism has commonly been treated as a primitive system both of religion and of society. As a system of religion it embraces the mystic union of the savage with his totem; as a system of society it comprises the relations in which men and women of the same totem stand to each other.

Freud, citing Frazer, presents totemism as simultaneously a religious system of mystical union with the animal and a social system regulating exogamy and clan membership.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Whether it is the ‘ancestor’ or the ‘initiatory master,’ the animal symbolizes a real and direct connection with the beyond. In a considerable number of myths and legends all over the world the hero is carried into the beyond by an animal.

Eliade situates the totem-ancestor animal within shamanic cosmology as the psychopomp that mediates initiation and passage to other worlds, linking it to the universal pattern of the hero’s otherworldly journey.

Eliade, Mircea, Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy, 1951supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Robertson Smith has shown us that the ancient totem meal recurs in the original form of sacrifice. The meaning of the act is the same: sanctification through participation in a common meal. The sense of guilt, which can only be allayed by the solidarity of all the participants, also persists.

Freud traces the totemic sacrificial meal as the archaic prototype of all subsequent religious sacrifice, arguing that the sense of communal guilt binding the clan persists structurally into later religious forms.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the game of identification was played in relation to the animals — and in particular those upon which the life of the human society depended. And the game was that of a mutual understanding, supposed to exist between the two worlds, realized and represented in rites.

Campbell frames totemism as a ritual game of identification with the sustaining animal species, establishing a mythologically mediated reciprocity between human and animal worlds enacted in ceremony.

Campbell, Joseph, Primitive Mythology (The Masks of God, Volume I), 1959supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Totemism, on the contrary, is something alien to our contemporary feelings — a religio-social institution which has been long abandoned as an actuality and replaced by newer forms. It has left only the slightest traces behind it in the religions, manners and customs of the civilized peoples of to-day.

Freud frames totemism’s apparent obsolescence as a hermeneutic problem, arguing that its traces survive in childhood and in religious forms, making depth-psychological reconstruction both necessary and possible.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we mentally rebel against the totemist’s claim of kinship with beast and plant. The average Athenian, when he was told by Empedokles that he had once been a bird or a tree, was probably as much surprised and disgusted as the theologian of the last century when it was hinted to him that his remoter ancestors were apes.

Harrison draws a structural parallel between totemic claims of animal kinship and reincarnation doctrine, situating both as primitive expressions of a perennial sense of continuity between human and non-human life.

Harrison, Jane Ellen, Themis: A Study of the Social Origins of Greek Religion, 1912supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

In the Trois Frères cave in France, a dancing human being, with antlers, a horse’s head, and bear’s paws… The most interesting figures in the cave paintings are those of semihuman beings in animal disguise.

Jung interprets Paleolithic human-animal hybrid figures as the prehistoric precursor of the totem relationship, in which ritual identification with the animal species constituted both magic and nascent symbol formation.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Man and His Symbols, 1964supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This idea, which rests on the pre-animistic belief in metamorphosis… the stag was saved from being killed by the fact that he possessed himself all the magic by which men threatened to kill him, and was therefore even in this respect identical with men.

Rank traces the pre-animistic logic underlying totemic prohibitions, showing how identity between human and animal rests on the belief in shared magical substance and mutual metamorphic capacity.

Rank, Otto, Art and Artist: Creative Urge and Personality Development, 1932aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

this shift to animal shape is not a power of transformation due to the mature omnipotence of the god; it is with the Dithyrambos from his birth; it is part of his essence as the Twice-Born.

Harrison argues that the god’s animal form in Greek religion is not a late metaphor but a survival of totemic animal identity constitutive of the deity’s original nature.

Harrison, Jane Ellen, Themis: A Study of the Social Origins of Greek Religion, 1912aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

he came to see himself that the motive from which that second theory derived totemism was too ‘rational’ and that it implied a social organization which was too complicated to be described as primitive.

Freud recounts Frazer’s self-critique of sociological theories of totemism’s origin, setting the stage for a deeper, psychologically grounded account of the phenomenon.

Freud, Sigmund, Totem and Taboo, 1913aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

There are also images like the Minotaur where you have a bull’s head and a human body… you get this terrible feeling — it’s so sad it makes you cry — of being caught inside that bull’s head.

Hillman probes the affective ambiguity of human-animal hybrids in mythology, distinguishing the monstrous (Minotaur) from the healing (Chiron) as variants of the same deep encounter with animal nature.

Hillman, James, Animal Presences, 2008aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →