The throne, within the depth-psychology and comparative mythology corpus, operates as a primary symbol of sovereign legitimacy, cosmological order, and the axial relationship between the human and the divine. Its significance ramifies in at least four directions. First, in the matriarchal-archaeological register opened by Neumann, the throne is traced to the body of the Great Mother herself — the king does not merely occupy a seat but re-enters the womb, and coronation is a ritual rebirth. Second, in the cosmological-mythological register shared by Campbell and Vernant, every earthly throne mirrors a celestial prototype: the ziggurat stages, the heavenly court, the king as microcosmic axis mundi all converge on the throne as the point where divine sovereignty is made spatially legible. Third, in the mystical-theophanic register elaborated by Corbin, the throne (especially the Quranic ‘arsh and Solomon’s transported throne) becomes the locus where creative imagination and divine epiphany intersect, demonstrating that sovereignty is ontological before it is political. Fourth, in the religious-historical register (Eliade, Evans-Wentz, Place), the throne marks the sky-god’s dwelling — Baiame’s crystal throne, the Dhyani Buddhas’ animal-thrones, Ezekiel’s merkabah — linking celestial sovereignty to initiatory ascent. Across these registers a common tension persists: whether the throne symbolises a fixed ontological centre or a perpetually renewed manifestation.