Thebes occupies a surprisingly diffuse but symbolically dense position in the depth-psychology corpus. It appears most insistently not as a historical city-state but as the mythic locus of fate, transgression, and divine punishment — the city whose founding house (Kadmos, Semele, Dionysos) and whose royal line (Laios, Oedipus, Eteokles, Antigone) make it the pre-eminent site where the unconscious erupts into civic order. Kerényi treats Thebes as the earthly home of Dionysos Kadmeios, anchoring the god’s archetype in Mycenaean cultic continuity. Burkert documents its ritual epithets — Dionysos Perikionios, Dionysos Omestes — revealing a city saturated with extreme Dionysiac practice. Liz Greene reads Thebes psychologically as the stage of inescapable fate: Laios cannot outrun the oracle, Oedipus cannot outrun his parentage, and the city itself falls sick when the king’s unconscious crime goes unacknowledged. Hillman radicalises this: the tragedy of Oedipus is inseparable from the tragedy of the polis, and any psychotherapy that focuses solely on the individual ignores the murderous wound in the order of the world. Harrison’s ritual scholarship adds the dimension of the sacred abaton — lightning-struck precincts of Semele’s bridal chamber, places where heaven has touched earth. Taken together, Thebes functions in the corpus as the mythic city of fate, the uncanny birthplace of Dionysos, and the paradigmatic sick-city whose cure requires acknowledgment of what has been repressed.