Terror Of History

The ‘Terror of History’ is Mircea Eliade’s signal contribution to the phenomenology of religious and historical consciousness, designating the existential dread provoked by irreversible, non-repeatable historical events experienced as meaningless suffering. Eliade’s argument, developed most systematically in ‘The Myth of the Eternal Return’ (1954), is that archaic humanity defended itself against this terror through cosmological repetition — the ritual re-enactment of archetypal patterns that dissolved the particularity of historical time into the reassurance of sacred precedent. The terminus of his inquiry is the modern predicament: once the horizon of archetypes and eternal return is abandoned, once historicism insists that events have no meaning beyond their singular occurrence, the human being is left fully exposed to history’s arbitrary violence with no transcendent consolation available. Eliade surveys the remedies on offer — Marxist eschatology, Nietzschean amor fati, existentialist heroism — and finds each insufficient; only a philosophy of freedom that retains the category of faith, inaugurated by Judaeo-Christian revelation, can genuinely absorb the terror. The concept intersects with depth-psychological concerns insofar as it names a collective anxiety structurally analogous to individual trauma: the wound of meaningless, unmediated exposure to contingency. The related depth-psychological literature treats this anxiety obliquely through discussions of cyclical time, eschatology, the demonism of modernity, and the psychological functions of myth.

In the library 10 passages

just as the contemporaries of a ‘dark age’ consoled themselves for their increasing sufferings by the thought that the aggravation of evil hastens final deliverance, so the militant Marxist of our day reads, in the drama provoked by the pressure of history, a necessary evil

Eliade demonstrates that Marxist eschatology functions as a modern secular analogue to archaic mythic consolation, offering relief from the terror of history by relocating the ‘age of gold’ at history’s end rather than its beginning.

Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History, 1954thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the horizon of archetypes and repetition cannot be transcended with impunity unless we accept a philosophy of freedom that does not exclude God

Eliade argues that the only adequate response to the terror of history is not existentialist resignation or cyclical repetition but a Judaeo-Christian philosophy of faith in which all things remain possible for God and for man.

Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History, 1954thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

man is left free to choose between two positions: (1) to oppose the history that is being made by the very small minority… (2) to take refuge in a subhuman existence or in flight

Eliade exposes how the modern individual, stripped of transhistorical models, is effectively coerced by history rather than free within it, intensifying rather than resolving the terror of history.

Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History, 1954thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we believe we are justified in seeing in them, rather than a resistance to history, a revolt against historical time, an attempt to restore this historical time, freighted as it is with human experience, to a place in the time that is cosmic, cyclical, and infinite

Eliade reads the nostalgia for eternal repetition in Eliot and Joyce as symptomatic evidence that the terror of history produces a cultural counter-movement seeking reintegration with cosmic, non-linear time.

Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History, 1954thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the barbarian invaders of the High Middle Ages were assimilated to the Biblical archetype Gog and Magog and thus received an ontological status and an eschatological function

Eliade illustrates how pre-modern European Christianity managed the terror of history by absorbing catastrophic historical events into archetypal and eschatological frameworks that conferred meaning on suffering.

Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History, 1954supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the historical moment, despite the possibilities of escape it offers contemporaries, can never, in its entirety, be anything but tragic, pathetic, unjust, chaotic, as any moment that heralds the final catastrophe must be

Eliade shows how cyclical cosmological systems provided a structural containment of historical terror by locating every present moment within a predictable arc of decline toward regeneration.

Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History, 1954supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in philosophy the myth of eternal return is revivified by Nietzsche; or that, in the philosophy of history, a Spengler or a Toynbee concern themselves with the problem of periodicity

Eliade contextualizes the modern rehabilitation of cyclical theories — from Nietzsche to Toynbee — as intellectual responses to the mounting pressure of historical terror in the wake of historicism’s dominance.

Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History, 1954supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the age of total blood baths, total demonization, and total dehumanization could begin… the demonism of Nature, which man had apparently triumphed over, he has unwittingly swallowed into himself and so become the devil’s marionette

Jung diagnoses the eruption of mass historical violence as the consequence of projecting and then re-introjecting humanity’s own demonic potentials, providing a depth-psychological parallel to Eliade’s terror of history.

Jung, C.G., Collected Works Volume 18: The Symbolic Life, 1976supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

One of the two great unifying mythic patterns (the other being the Eternal Return, the death-rebirth cycle), is the mythologem of the hero quest

Hollis briefly invokes the Eternal Return as one of two master mythic patterns organizing the psyche’s journey, implicitly acknowledging the framework Eliade deploys in his analysis of the terror of history.

Hollis, James, Swamplands of the Soul: New Life in Dismal Places, 1996aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

history was more trivial than poetry and myth: ‘The one describes what has happened, the other what might. Hence poetry is something more philosophic and serious than history’

Armstrong, drawing on Aristotle, registers the classical devaluation of singular historical event in favor of universal mythic pattern — a pre-Eliaden version of the gesture that the terror of history makes philosophically urgent.

Armstrong, Karen, A History of God, 1993aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms