Symptom As Communication

The Seba library treats Symptom As Communication in 9 passages, across 7 authors (including Winnicott, Donald, Schwartz, Richard C, Freud, Sigmund).

In the library

the regressive tendency in a psychotic case is part of the ill individual’s communication, which the analyst can understand in the same way that he understands the hysterical symptom as a communication.

Winnicott explicitly names the hysterical symptom as the paradigmatic instance of symptom-as-communication and extends that logic to psychotic regression, framing both as messages the analyst must decode rather than behaviours to suppress.

Winnicott, Donald, The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, 1965thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we can proceed to relate to the symptom as we would any part… speak directly to the symptom as a part… ask if any part has information about the symptom.

Schwartz operationalises the communicative symptom by treating physical symptoms as sub-personalities bearing information, inviting therapeutic dialogue rather than pathological categorisation.

Schwartz, Richard C, Internal Family Systems Therapy, 1995thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

it is no accident but has in it motive, meaning, and intention; it belongs to a mental context which can be specified; and it provides a small indication of a more important mental process.

Freud establishes that even minor symptomatic acts are intentional communicative signs belonging to a coherent unconscious context, laying the semiotic groundwork for all subsequent depth-psychological treatments of the symptom.

Freud, Sigmund, Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, 1917thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the theory governing all psychical symptoms culminates in a single proposition, which asserts that they are to be regarded as fulfilments of unconscious wishes.

Freud’s foundational theorem — that symptoms express unconscious wish-fulfilments — provides the interpretive logic from which the communicative reading of symptoms proceeds.

Freud, Sigmund, The Interpretation of Dreams, 1900supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

relief of symptoms in one individual might lead to the development of symptoms in another… two elements in Skynner’s reading of Jung which are particularly interesting. These are system and symptom.

Samuels, drawing on Skynner’s reading of Jung, frames symptom as a systemic communication within the family field, such that its migration between members signals relational rather than merely individual dysfunction.

Samuels, Andrew, Jung and the Post-Jungians, 1985supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Translation into action involves publication, communication, and commonsense… thoughts have to be worked on to make them available for translation into action.

Bion’s account of thinking as requiring ‘publication’ and ‘communication’ implies that when normal thought-translation fails, symptomatic enactment becomes the surrogate communicative channel.

Bion, W.R., A Theory of Thinking, 1962supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

one can conclude from the appearance of blocking that we have struck upon one of his important complexes.

Bleuler’s observation that blocking indexes affectively charged complexes implicitly treats a negative symptom — the arrest of speech — as a communicative signal pointing toward unconscious significance.

Bleuler, Eugen, Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias, 1911aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

these subjects, whose mind retrogrades, in my opinion, lose the delicacy, the perfection, of certain functions, and you can very well notice their return to animality from the vulgarity of certain delicate movements.

Janet’s clinical description of hysterical symptom-expression as a regression of refined function gestures toward, without fully theorising, the symptom’s communicative dimension in the pre-psychoanalytic tradition.

Janet, Pierre, The Major Symptoms of Hysteria, 1907aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →