Sympathy

Sympathy occupies a contested and multivalent position across the depth-psychology corpus. The term moves between at least three distinct registers. In its ancient Greek form it denotes co-suffering — Aristotle’s sunalgein and sunkhairein — a shared affective resonance that differs crucially from pity (eleos), which requires a detached observer who does not share the misfortune. Konstan’s careful philological work establishes that modern sympathy, indebted to Hume’s contagion model, departs significantly from this classical inheritance, creating a persistent anachronism in readings of ancient emotion. In the Neoplatonic and Sufi registers recovered by Plotinus and elaborated by Corbin, sympathy ascends to a cosmological principle — the Universal Sympathy of Plotinus that holds the One in undivided communion, and the ‘divine sympathesis’ of Ibn Arabi through which the mystic embraces all theophanies. Romanyshyn relocates this metaphysical resonance within phenomenological research method, treating sympathetic resonance as an epistemological validity criterion grounded in the researcher’s own woundedness. Contemporary affect theorists such as Lench distinguish sympathy from empathy, compassion, and nurturant love along the axis of distress-specificity and prosocial motivation. Ricoeur, for his part, situates sympathy within solicitude, where equality between self and other is reestablished through the shared admission of mortality. Together these positions reveal sympathy as a hinge concept between cosmos, ethics, method, and clinical encounter.

In the library 12 passages

this content is held as the living universe holds the natural forms of the living creatures in it from the greatest to the least… This is what is known as the Universal Sympathy, not of course the sympathy known here which is a copy

Plotinus distinguishes the authentic Universal Sympathy — the undivided unity of all within the One — from its earthly copy, which operates among things in separation, establishing sympathy as a cosmological rather than merely psychological principle.

Plotinus, The Six Enneads, 270thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

To become a Compassionate One is to become the likeness of the Compassionate God experiencing infinite sadness over undisclosed virtualities; it is to embrace, in a total religious sympathy, the theophanies of these divine Names in all faiths.

Corbin, drawing on Ibn Arabi, presents religious sympathy as the mystic’s total embrace of all divine theophanies, a participation in the primordial divine sympathesis that emancipates rather than merely accepts finite expressions of the divine.

Corbin, Henry, Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi, 1969thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

pity has been displaced by neighbouring concepts such as sympathy, empathy, and compassion, all of which bear some relationship to pity, no doubt, but also differ in important ways, and more especially from the classical Greek concept represented by the term eleos

Konstan argues that modern sympathy has displaced ancient eleos in popular and scholarly usage while differing from it fundamentally, since Greek pity depended on judgment of undeserved suffering rather than on emotional identification.

David Konstan, The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature, 2006thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Such a description of sympathy has little to do with the ancient Greek notion of eleos, and its roots lie elsewhere… it was just insofar as one did not share another’s misfortune that one was in a position to pity it.

Konstan, via Hume’s contagion model of sympathy, demonstrates the categorical distance between modern sympathetic identification and ancient Greek pity, which required a structurally detached observer rather than shared affect.

David Konstan, The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature, 2006thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Modern ideas of sympathy are inspired by an epistemological question: how is it that human beings, each locked into his or her own private world of sensations, ever come to know and appreciate the feelings of other people?

Konstan locates the genealogy of modern sympathy in the epistemological ‘problem of other minds,’ contrasting this with the ancient Greek assumption that others’ feelings are directly knowable and that ethical quality of response was the primary concern.

David Konstan, The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature, 2006thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

sympathetic resonance ‘as a validation procedure for the researcher’s particular intuitive insights and syntheses’… the validity of one’s research is tested by how it harmonizes with the experience of others.

Romanyshyn, drawing on Anderson’s intuitive inquiry, argues that sympathy functions as a methodological validity criterion in depth-psychological research, grounded in the prolonged attunement between the wounded researcher and the work itself.

Romanyshyn, Robert D., The Wounded Researcher: Research with Soul in Mind, 2007thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the purpose being to establish, in new terms, a phenomenology of prophetic religion… distinguished by its application of a phenomenology of sympathy to an analysis of prophetic religion and by the antitheses it works out between the categories of prophetic religion and those of mystical religion.

Corbin identifies a phenomenology of sympathy — derived from the Neoplatonic link between tropos and sympathy — as the operative framework for understanding prophetic religion in contrast to mystical religion.

Corbin, Henry, Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi, 1969supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

for what we might call positive sympathy, Aristotle employs words such as sunkhairein, sunedesthai, and analogous compounds with the prefix sun-, which signify that we feel the same pleasure as the other, or feel it as our own.

Konstan identifies Aristotle’s compound sun- expressions as the closest ancient Greek equivalent to positive sympathy — shared joy or pain — while noting that this differs structurally from eleos, which maintains a distance between pitier and pitied.

David Konstan, The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature, 2006supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in the case of sympathy that comes from the self and extends to the other, equality is reestablished only through the shared admission of fragility and, finally, of mortality.

Ricoeur situates sympathy within his ethics of solicitude, arguing that it moves from the self toward the other and reestablishes equality not through reciprocity but through the mutual acknowledgment of human fragility and mortality.

Ricoeur, Paul, Oneself as Another, 1992supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the mystic knows and feels this without need of any other pledge than the sympathetic passion which gives him, or rather which is, this Presence, for love asks no questions.

Corbin presents sympathetic passion in the Sufi context as the immediate, pledge-free mode of mystical presence whereby the fedele knows his Lord — a knowing that collapses the distance between subject and divine object.

Corbin, Henry, Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi, 1969supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

sympathy is experienced specifically as a response toward the target individual’s distress… while the prosocial behavior resulting from sympathy is thought to originate in feelings of empathetic distress, nurturant love is typically experienced as positive and pleasurable.

Lench distinguishes sympathy from nurturant love by its distress-specific trigger and its roots in empathetic distress, clarifying the functional boundaries between adjacent caregiving emotions.

Lench, Heather C., The Function of Emotions: When and Why Emotions Help Us, 2018supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms