Surrendered Limitation occupies a distinctive and generative position in the depth-psychology corpus, marking the moment at which the ego’s recognition of its own finitude ceases to be mere defeat and becomes the precondition for transformation. Across the literature, writers as varied as Ernest Kurtz, Llewellyn Vaughan-Lee, Christina Grof, Kenneth Pargament, and the I Ching commentators converge on a paradox: limitation is not simply endured but must be actively surrendered to in order to release its curative power. Kurtz, writing from within the Alcoholics Anonymous tradition, frames this most precisely—acceptance of limitation is not a passive concession but an affirmative act, the very ground from which healing and human connectedness arise. Vaughan-Lee, drawing on Sufi depth-psychology, emphasizes that surrendered limitation requires prior exhaustion of every ego resource, so that the surrender is complete rather than strategic. Grof extends this into addiction phenomenology, where ‘hitting bottom’ is the liminal crucible in which the self’s defenses finally collapse. Pargament introduces the crucial distinction between surrender as passivity and surrender as voluntary release, noting that what determines the outcome is the object to which limitation is surrendered. The I Ching exegetical tradition, particularly through Wilhelm and Anthony, supplies a cosmological grammar for the concept: galling limitation destroys, but sweet or freely accepted limitation structures time, agriculture, and governance. The central tension in the corpus is between surrender as defeat and surrender as the highest volitional act the bounded self can perform.