The figure of the suppliant occupies a structurally charged position in the depth-psychology corpus, situated at the intersection of ritual, shame, honour, and the psychodynamics of power asymmetry. Benveniste’s philological excavations reveal that the suppliant is not merely a petitioner but a body enacting a posture—supplex as ‘one bent at the feet of’—whose submission is simultaneously a consecrated act, transforming the petitioned party into a sacred guarantor. The Greek hikétēs, derived from the verb hikánō (‘to arrive at, to reach’), condenses approach, contact, and appeal into a single ritual gesture, most paradigmatically the touching of knees. Cairns, working through the lens of aidōs, demonstrates that supplication creates a field of obligatory emotional response: the suppliant’s vulnerability calls forth aidōs in the supplicated, generating a tension between ritual demand and individual will that Greek tragedy stages repeatedly. Critically, aidōs can operate as an inhibitor of supplication—Menelaus refuses to supplicate Theonoë lest it compromise his glory—as much as it functions as the moral engine compelling its acceptance. Adkins introduces the agathos dimension: in heroic culture, protecting the suppliant one has accepted is an expression of aretē. Across these registers, the suppliant figures as the limit-case of social vulnerability, the point at which the systems of honour, piety, and hospitality are simultaneously tested and constituted.