Subjective Object

The term 'subjective object' occupies a charged intersection in the depth-psychology corpus, drawing its principal formulation from Winnicott but resonating across Jungian, phenomenological, and transpersonal registers. Winnicott's contribution is decisive: in his account of primitive female-element relating, the infant does not relate to the breast as an external object but rather becomes it — the object is the subject. This dissolution of the subject-object boundary at the earliest developmental level stands as the foundation of primary identity and being. Jung, by contrast, elaborates the 'subjective factor' as the a priori disposition that co-determines any perception of the object, insisting that the subject's contribution to experience is as real and universal as the external world itself; here the emphasis falls not on merger but on the ineradicable coloring of the object by the perceiving subject. Hillman's archetypal psychology radicalizes this further, arguing that one can never bracket the subjectivism inherent in psychic life, since fantasy structures always already dominate subjective experience. McGilchrist frames the subject-object divide as itself an artifact of left-hemisphere analysis rather than a feature of reality. The tension running through the corpus is thus threefold: developmental (Winnicott's pre-differentiated state), epistemological (Jung's subjective factor as universal co-determinant), and ontological (the question of whether subject and object are ultimately separable at all).

In the library

the pure female element relates to the breast (or to the mother) in the sense of the baby becoming the breast (or mother), in the sense that the object is the subject. I can see no instinct drive in this.

Winnicott defines the subjective object as the condition in which the boundary between self and object collapses at the level of pure female-element being, constituting primary identity prior to any instinct-driven relating.

Winnicott, D W, Playing and Reality, 1971thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

By the subjective factor I understand that psychological action or reaction which merges with the effect produced by the object and so gives rise to a new psychic datum.

Jung defines the subjective factor as the universal, a priori psychic contribution that fuses with the object's influence to produce every percept, making it as foundational and ineluctable as any external reality.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the image of an object is composed subjectively on the one side, it is conditioned objectively on the other side. When I reproduce it in myself, I am producing something that is determined as much subjectively as objectively.

Jung argues that every psychic image of an object is a dual product of subjective and objective determination, requiring interpretive judgment about which pole predominates in any given case.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, 1960supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the introverted standpoint is one which sets the ego and the subjective psychological process above the object and the objective process, or at any rate seeks to hold its ground against the object.

Jung frames introversion as the typological disposition that systematically elevates the subjective process over the object, treating external objects as tokens or embodiments of inner contents.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

if the ego has usurped the claims of the subject, this naturally produces, by way of compensation, an unconscious reinforcement of the influence of the object.

Jung warns that when the ego displaces the true self as the subjective pole, the object reasserts itself compensatorily with overwhelming and uncontrollable force.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The polarity between the 'objective' and 'subjective' points of view is a creation of the left hemisphere's analytic disposition. In reality there can be neither absolutely, only a choice between a betweenness which acknowledges itself, and one which denies its own nature.

McGilchrist contends that the subject-object polarity is not a primary feature of reality but an artifact of analytic cognition, with genuine experience always occupying an irreducible betweenness.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, 2009supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

One is never beyond the subjectivism given with the soul's native dominants of fantasy structures. These dominate subjective

Hillman argues that archetypal psychology forecloses any purely objective stance, since fantasy — as the psyche's native activity — always saturates subjective experience from within.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

One is never beyond the subjectivism given with the soul's native dominants of fantasy structures. These dominate subjective

The parallel text confirms Hillman's position that subjectivism is constitutive of psychic life, rendering full phenomenological objectivity impossible.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account, 1983supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the more subjective and emotional this impression is, the more likely it is that the property will be a projection. Yet here we must make a not unimportant distinction: between the quality actually present in the object... and the value, significance, or energy of this quality.

Jung distinguishes between objective qualities belonging to the object and the energic surplus added by projection, clarifying the mechanism by which the subjective factor transforms the perceived object.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, 1960supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the East habitually attaches to the 'subjective factor'. By this I mean the 'dark background' of consciousness, the unconscious. The introverted attitude is characterized in general by an emphasis on the a priori data of apperception.

In his commentary on Tibetan liberation teaching, Jung identifies the Eastern valorization of the subjective factor with the unconscious background of apperception, linking it to introversion and the withdrawal of psychic gravity from ego-consciousness.

Evans-Wentz, W. Y., The Tibetan Book of the Great Liberation, 1954supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Sensation, which by its very nature is dependent on the object and on objective stimuli, undergoes considerable modification in the introverted attitude. It, too, has a subjective factor, for besides the sensed object there is a sensing subject who adds his subjective disposition to the objective stimulus.

Jung demonstrates that even sensation — the most object-bound function — is modified by the subjective factor in the introverted attitude, altering perception at its source.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Psychological Types, 1921supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The subjective factor in sensation is essentially the same as in the other introverted types. It is an unconscious disposition which alters the sense-perception at its source, thus depriving it of the character of a purely objective influence.

Sharp consolidates Jung's account, showing that the subjective factor operates as an unconscious disposition across introverted types, systematically transforming the character of objective perception.

Sharp, Daryl, Personality Types: Jung's Model of Typology, 1987supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

when objective consciousness melts in your subjective consciousness, [then] that subjective consciousness [with] the mixture of objective consciousness... enters in that Universal consciousness.

The Kashmir Shaivite commentary describes a contemplative dissolution of the object into subjective consciousness that subsequently opens onto Universal consciousness, offering a non-Western parallel to Winnicott's subject-object merger.

Singh, Jaideva, Vijnana Bhairava: The Manual for Self-Realization, 1979aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

my subjective image is only grosso modo identical with the object. Any portrait painter will agree with th

Jung, cited through Edinger, acknowledges the irreducible gap between the subjective psychic image and its putative objective referent, grounding epistemological humility in the nature of representation.

Edinger, Edward F., The New God-Image: A Study of Jung's Key Letters Concerning the Evolution of the Western God-Image, 1996aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Every application of a conscious function, whatever the object might be, is always accompanied by subjective reactions which are more or less inadmissible or unjust or inaccurate.

Jung notes that all conscious functioning is accompanied by subjective reactive components that typically remain in the shadow, constituting the personal unconscious residue of every object-relation.

Jung, C.G., Collected Works Volume 18: The Symbolic Life, 1976aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms