Stasis occupies a complex and frequently paradoxical position in the depth-psychological and philosophical corpus gathered in this library. Far from denoting mere inertness, the term circulates across several registers that resist simple unification. In its classical Greek usage, most vividly documented by Padel’s reading of Thucydides, stasis names civil war — a destructive inner rupture of the body politic that mirrors disease and daemonic passion. This violent political sense shadows all subsequent uses. McGilchrist, drawing on Heraclitus, converts the term into a philosophical crux: genuine stasis is not the opposite of movement but its necessary counterpart, the tensioned stillness within which flux becomes intelligible — ‘movement within stasis, and stasis within movement.’ Hillman, working in the alchemical register, treats stasis as cessation pure and simple, the yellowing arrest of forward process, a ‘dead stop’ that dissolves developmental fantasy. Campbell, via Joyce, recuperates a luminous form of stasis as the arrested, rapturous condition of aesthetic apprehension. Berry’s phenomenology of ‘stopping’ in the Perseus myth suggests that a willed, self-dissolving stillness can itself be a mode of animation and perception. Together these voices establish a productive tension: stasis as pathological fixation versus stasis as constitutive ground of living process.