Spiritual Rebirth occupies a privileged position in the depth-psychology corpus precisely because it refuses reduction to a single register — it is simultaneously a psychological event, a mythological structure, an initiatory ordeal, and a metaphysical claim. Jung provides the foundational taxonomy, distinguishing reincarnation, resurrection, and psychological transformation as distinct modalities of the rebirth idea, insisting that what matters clinically is the inward mutation of the personality rather than any cosmological assertion. Neumann extends this into the archetypal grammar of the Great Mother, situating rebirth as structurally dependent on a prior descent into the feminine vessel — dissolution before reconstitution. Eliade approaches the same territory through comparative religion, demonstrating that the initiatory death-and-rebirth schema underlies sacred knowledge across Hindu, Buddhist, and Greek traditions alike. Grof radicalises the experiential dimension through perinatal research, anchoring spiritual rebirth to the somatic memory of biological birth and its transpersonal amplifications. Tarnas reads the theme astrologically, correlating collective eruptions of rebirth symbolism with Uranus-Neptune alignments. The Philokalia voices insist on ascetic transformation as the precondition for any authentic renewal. What unites these otherwise divergent perspectives is the consensus that spiritual rebirth is never mere moral improvement but demands the death of a prior selfhood — ego dissolution, shadow confrontation, or kenotic surrender — before a qualitatively new mode of being can emerge.