The term ‘spiritual path’ functions in the depth-psychology corpus not as a single, agreed-upon trajectory but as a contested site where divergent models of transformation—linear ascent, labyrinthine wandering, surrender, and ego-dissolution—meet and interrogate one another. Trungpa’s foundational critique in Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism establishes the governing tension: the path is perpetually threatened by the ego’s capacity to colonize spiritual aspiration itself, converting genuine transformation into self-aggrandizement. Welwood extends this into a psychological register, arguing that the path demands nothing less than ‘losing it’—the dissolution of confining personality structures—while simultaneously insisting that psychotherapy and meditation must work in concert to prevent spiritual bypassing. Moore offers a counter-topology: where religious literature imagines the spiritual path as vertical ascent toward perfection, the soul’s path is labyrinthine, polytropian, resistant to single-minded progress. Vaughan-Lee’s Sufi corpus positions the path as annihilation of the wayfarer in the Beloved, a total surrender incompatible with any residual ego-agenda. Aurobindo situates the path within evolutionary cosmology, identifying four approaches—religion, occultism, spiritual thought, and inner realization—of which only the last constitutes decisive entry. Grof reframes addiction recovery itself as a spiritual path through emptiness toward wholeness. Across these voices, the irreducible tensions concern direction (ascent versus labyrinth), agency (effort versus surrender), and the relationship between psychological work and contemplative practice.