The depth-psychology corpus approaches spiritual life not as a settled theological category but as a contested, dynamic arena in which the deepest movements of the psyche encounter transcendence, community, embodiment, and shadow. The Philokalic tradition, represented by Palmer, Sherrard, and Ware alongside Coniaris, frames spiritual life as a tripartite ascent — purgative, illuminative, and unitive — grounded in prayer, watchfulness, and the progressive deification of the whole person. Sri Aurobindo extends this developmental logic into evolutionary metaphysics, arguing that spiritual life is consciousness liberating itself from involution in matter toward gnosis. Thomas Moore, drawing on Ficino and Jung, introduces a crucial structural tension: spirituality and soul are not identical, and a spiritual life severed from soulful depth risks becoming rigid, moralistic, and authoritarian. Robert Masters and John Welwood press this tension further, diagnosing the pathology of spiritual bypassing — the deployment of spiritual practice as evasion of psychological suffering. The recovery literature (Laudet, Mathieu, ACA) repositions spiritual life as a therapeutic and communal achievement, distinct from but related to religiosity. Across all these voices runs a central problematic: how spiritual ascent is to be reconciled with embodied descent, and whether transformation of the whole being — rather than credal assent or contemplative technique alone — is the true criterion of a genuine spiritual life.