Spiritual bypass occupies a critical junction in depth-psychological discourse, named and theorized principally by John Welwood beginning in the 1970s and subsequently elaborated by Robert Augustus Masters and Ingrid Mathieu, among others. The term designates a defensive maneuver in which spiritual practice or belief is conscripted to circumvent unresolved emotional wounds, developmental deficits, and the ordinary demands of embodied selfhood. The corpus reveals no monolithic consensus: Masters treats spiritual bypass as a pervasive pathology of contemporary spirituality, one that penetrates even the subtlest contemplative methodologies and that thrives wherever psychoemotional depth work is absent from spiritual formation. Mathieu, writing from within addiction recovery, complicates the picture by demonstrating that spiritual bypass may function as a transitional, even adaptive, phase in psychospiritual development—harmful when it calcifies into permanent avoidance, but potentially scaffolding when it bridges the practitioner toward deeper integration. A central tension runs throughout: the question of whether transcendence is ever legitimate or whether any movement ‘above’ ordinary psychological pain is, by definition, evasive. The corpus also implicates shadow work, embodiment, emotional literacy, narcissism, and the structure of the pre/trans fallacy as conceptually proximate concerns. What unites these voices is the insistence that authentic spiritual development must move through the human rather than around it.