The concordance 24 witnesses
Orientation
A cry from the cross undoes a doctrine of unity: Christ’s last words, James Hillman observes in Senex and Puer, carry a residue of puer conflict even as the creed insists Father and Son are one. That fracture between dogma and psyche is the term’s subject. John of Damascus sets the theological baseline: the Son is begotten from the Father’s own being, not from matter or partition, an origin without subordination. Jung transposes the logic into psychology, reading the Son as the archetype of consciousness that must discriminate itself from inherited habit; elsewhere he traces homosexuality, Don Juanism, and impotence to the son’s tie to the mother. Edward Edinger distinguishes four irreducible registers of the Son of Man, personalistic, archetypal-Anthropos, messianic, and eschatological, and takes their co-presence as the mark of a living symbol. Erich Neumann’s son, transfixed between elemental parents, calls twice to the father and drifts back to the mother on the third. Hillman completes the diagnosis: the son’s civilizational conquests are disguised service to that same maternal matrix, while the puer seeks the father’s recognition, spirit by spirit.
The Christianity symbolized by the ‘Son’ therefore forces the individual to discriminate and to reflect… Habit can only be replaced by a mode of life consciously chosen and acquired.
Jung argues that the ‘Son’ symbol carries a psychological imperative: it demands conscious differentiation from the inherited father-habitus, making it the archetype of reflective individual consciousness.
, Psychology and Religion: West and East, 1958thesis
Son of Man refers to the original man, or Anthropos, that first appeared in early Near Eastern myth… a primal Man spelled with a capital M.
Edinger identifies four irreducible interpretive categories for ‘Son of Man’—personalistic, archetypal-Anthropos, messianic, and eschatological—arguing that their co-presence marks it as a living symbol.
, Transformation of the God-Image: An Elucidation of Jung’s Answer to Job, 1992thesis
The son does not need the father, whereas the puer seeks recognition from the father, a recognition of spirit by spirit that leads to eventual fatherhood in the puer itself.
Hillman draws a structural distinction between the ‘son’ as a mother-bound position secured by existential guarantees and the puer as a figure whose telos is spirit-recognition by the father and eventual self-fathering.
, Senex & Puer, 2015thesis
Christian doctrine, which insists that recognition of the unity of Father and Son is the way of redemption. But that very Jungian of sames is threatened by the Son’s last words on the cross, perhaps a residue of puer consciousness not joined with the Father.
Hillman reads the Father-Son unity in Christian doctrine as the mythic template for the senex-puer reconciliation that constitutes psychological redemption, while noting that the Crucifixion cry betrays a residual split.
, Senex & Puer, 2015thesis
He therefore, the Unbegotten, before time was begot a Son from Himself; not from any pre-existent matter… not by way of childbirth, for in God there is neither change nor void.
John of Damascus establishes the orthodox parameters of Sonship: the Son is begotten from the Father’s very being, not from matter or by partition, securing the co-essentiality that makes the relation the archetype of non-subordinate origination.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016thesis
Transfixed between mother and father, he twice calls out to his father. But his third call drifts back—to the mother.
Neumann stages the son as a cosmogonic figure suspended between elemental maternal and paternal poles, whose drift back toward the mother dramatizes the developmental crisis of incomplete patriarchal differentiation.
, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019thesis
The son disguises himself as the hyperactive culture hero of civilization, all of whose conquests, glories, triumphs, and spoils ultimately serve the mother of material civilization.
Hillman argues that the culture-hero identity is a disguise for the mother-bound son, whose apparent autonomy and conquest mask a deeper service to the maternal matrix of material civilization.
, Senex & Puer, 2015thesis
Typical effects on the son are homosexuality and Don Juanism, and sometimes also impotence. In homosexuality, the son’s entire heterosexuality is tied to the mother in an unconscious form.
Jung catalogues the typical distortions produced when the mother-complex dominates the son, showing how the mother archetype deflects or compulsively redirects the son’s relational and erotic development.
, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, 1959thesis
The ecstatic aspect in a man carried by the conjoined archetype of mother-son takes him yet further from the father’s inhibitions of order and limit.
Hillman traces how the mother-son archetypal conjunction produces ecstatic states that systematically dissolve the senex boundaries of order, limit, and fate, thereby reinforcing puer inflation.
, Senex & Puer, 2015supporting
The name of Father involves that of Son, since without having a son none can be a father… the Son is the complement of the Father, and to the Father the Son’s existence is due.
John of Damascus argues for the logical and ontological co-implication of Father and Son: neither term can be predicated without the other, so the divine unity is constitutively relational rather than solitary.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting
If it be sufficient for salvation to believe that He is the Christ, why does he add The Son of God?… the name of Son is not attached to Christ as a customary appendage due to adoption, seeing that it is essential to salvation.
John of Damascus insists that the name ‘Son of God’ is not an honorific addition but constitutive of the salvific confession, making genuine Sonship—not adoptive title—the doctrinal hinge of Christian soteriology.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting
When the mother has ‘eaten’ the son, she has largely destroyed with her animus such physical manifestations of masculinity as being dirty, wild, aggressive… That is the impulse of life which will lead him away from her.
Von Franz identifies the devouring mother’s destruction of the son’s bodily vitality as the mechanism by which the son’s shadow masculinity is split off, generating the characteristic puer-aeternus psychopathology.
, Puer Aeternus: A Psychological Study of the Adult Struggle with the Paradise of Childhood, 1970supporting
The enveloping, embracing, and devouring element points unmistakably to the mother, that is, to the son’s relation to the real mother, to her imago, and to the woman who is to become a mother for him.
Jung anchors the son’s anima-projection in his unconscious regression toward the maternal container, showing how the mother-imago mediates between the real mother and the son’s later erotic life.
, Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self, 1951supporting
A father may unconsciously fear that one day his son is going to kill him… the ‘Laius complex’—the father who is afraid (unconsciously) that he will be ousted or destroyed by his son.
Greene introduces the ‘Laius complex’ as the paternal underside of the Oedipal drama, showing that the father-son conflict is bidirectional and that the father’s unconscious dread of displacement is as structurally determinative as the son’s rivalry.
, The Luminaries: The Psychology of the Sun and Moon in the Horoscope, 1992supporting
No one comes to the Father except through the Son… the Son leads us to the Father. Through the birth the nature of God is abiding in the Son.
John of Damascus articulates a reciprocal mediation in which the Son is the necessary path to the Father and the Father draws through the Son, so that Sonship functions as the structural hinge of divine-human relationship.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting
Jesus Christ is both the Son of God and Son of Man, Who emptied Himself of the form of God, and received the form of a servant. There is not one Son of Man and another Son of God.
John of Damascus insists on the unitary identity of the Son: the kenotic self-emptying into human form does not split the Son into two subjects but reveals the single hypostasis bearing both natures.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting
When is the Father greater than the Son? Surely, when He gives Him the Name above every name. And on the other hand, when is it that the Son and the Father are one? Surely, when every tongue confesses that Jesus is Lord.
John of Damascus resolves the apparent subordinationist tension between ‘the Father is greater’ and ‘I and the Father are one’ by distributing them across the economy of giving and receiving rather than across natures.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting
The union of sames, the reunion of the vertical axis which would heal the split spirit… Still remains the union of the first Adam at the beginning with the second Adam at the end of history.
Hillman frames the father-son reunion as a ‘union of sames’ on the vertical axis, a form of integration as necessary as the coniunctio oppositorum for healing the ego-Self split at the core of individuation.
, A Blue Fire: The Essential James Hillman, 1989supporting
The Son is begotten of the Father and not the Father of the Son, and the Father naturally is the cause of the Son: just as we say in the same way not that fire proceedeth from light, but rather light from fire.
John of Damascus uses the light-fire analogy to specify that the Father’s causal priority over the Son is a priority of origination only, not of time, nature, or dignity, thereby preserving both distinction and co-essentiality.
, An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, 2021supporting
The Father Himself speaks from heaven, and His words are, This is My Son. What means this evidence, not of titles, but of pronouns? Titles may be appended to names at will; pronouns are a sure indication of the persons to whom they refer.
John of Damascus uses the grammatical distinction between titles and pronouns at the Baptism of Jesus to argue that the Father’s declaration authenticates real, not honorary, Sonship.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting
Lest it be supposed that Son and Father are titles the one merely of adoption, the other merely of dignity, let us see what are the attributes attached, by the Son Himself, to His name of Son.
John of Damascus moves beyond the Father’s testimony to the Son’s self-predication, insisting that only the attributes the Son himself attaches to the name ‘Son’ can settle whether the title denotes adoption or essential relation.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting
The Son is either an Agent, or He is not. If He is not an Agent, how does He please by his acts? If He is an Agent, in what sense are deeds, done not of Himself, His own?
John of Damascus exposes the logical contradiction in subordinationist Christology: the Son cannot simultaneously be praised for pleasing the Father and denied genuine agency, so the unity of natures must be affirmed.
, Saint John of Damascus Collection, 2016supporting
Studying a lineage like this one is a good way to learn about the kinds of issues that can come up between fathers and sons… how early complexes and other unfinished business from the past are passed on from one generation to the next.
Greene demonstrates through a three-generation astrological case study how the father-son complex transmits across generations, using chart comparison as a clinical tool for tracing inherited psychic patterns.
, The Luminaries: The Psychology of the Sun and Moon in the Horoscope, 1992aside
O son, son, son! / son, beloved lily, son, who will advise / my anguished heart? / O son, eyes of joy, son, why do you not answer?
Auerbach cites the Virgin’s lament at the Crucifixion as evidence of how medieval vernacular drama embedded the sublime theological drama of the Son’s death in the intimate register of maternal grief.
, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, 1953aside