Somatic processing occupies a contested and generative position within the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a clinical methodology, a neurobiological claim, and a philosophical corrective to cognitivist reductions of psychic life. The dominant contribution comes from the sensorimotor tradition, particularly through Ogden’s elaboration of bottom-up processing as a therapeutic vector distinct from—yet necessarily integrated with—emotional and cognitive levels of experience. Here, sensorimotor processing is not merely adjunctive but constitutively primary: traumatic imprints persist precisely as bodily action tendencies that resist verbal formulation, and therapeutic resolution requires working at the level of sensation, posture, and movement before narrative meaning can be consolidated. Levine’s Somatic Experiencing approach converges with Ogden on the necessity of completing thwarted biological survival responses, emphasizing physiological discharge and the ‘felt sense’ as the medium through which transformation occurs. Panksepp’s affective neuroscience provides the neuroanatomical substrate, distinguishing somatic from visceral information streams that converge in basal ganglia to generate coherent behavior. Damasio contributes the somatic marker hypothesis, repositioning body-based signals as constitutive of reasoning and decision-making rather than mere epiphenomena. Price’s MABT framework extends these principles into interoceptive awareness training as a discrete clinical skill. The central tension across the corpus is whether somatic processing is best understood as a bottom-up corrective to top-down cognitivism, or as a fully integrated biopsychosocial system requiring simultaneous multi-level engagement.