The soma-psyche relation stands as one of the central problematics of depth psychology, encompassing the question of whether body and psyche are ontologically distinct, reciprocally determining, or expressions of a single underlying reality. Jung’s contribution is foundational: he refused to reduce the psyche to a mere epiphenomenon of the body while equally resisting the Cartesian severance that would leave them utterly alien to one another. His notion of the psychoid — processes that are neither fully somatic nor fully psychic — marks a liminal zone where instinct shades into archetype and matter into meaning. Winnicott, approaching from the object-relational tradition, articulates the psychosomatic partnership as an achievement of healthy development, one that can be disrupted when the mind becomes a ‘thing in itself,’ usurping the integrative function. Marion Woodman, drawing on clinical work with eating disorders and body image disturbance, insists that the psyche/soma split is the governing pathology of modernity, treatable only when bodily movement and dream analysis are held in equal regard. Thomas Moore, following Ficino, identifies soul as the mediating third between spirit and matter, whose absence produces the splitting that pathologizes both. Hillman presses further, diagnosing the Cartesian conflation of body with inert matter as the root error that forces mind and flesh into mutual opposition. Across these positions, the soma-psyche relation is never merely theoretical but always clinical, cultural, and ultimately theological in its stakes.