The Solar Lunar Coniunctio stands at the intersection of alchemical symbolism, astrological psychology, and depth-psychological theory as one of the most generative and contested terms in the corpus. At its most fundamental, the term designates the union of contrary principles—solar (masculine, conscious, individuating) and lunar (feminine, instinctual, receptive)—whose synthesis the tradition identifies with psychological wholeness. Jung’s Mysterium Coniunctionis provides the locus classicus, situating the coniunctio within the alchemical opus as a union of psychic opposites; Edinger extends this reading, rendering the Philosophers’ Stone as precisely such a hot-solar and cold-lunar compounding. Greene and Sasportas transpose the motif into astrological psychology, treating the lunation cycle, the New Moon conjunction, and the Moon’s Nodes as the chart’s own grammar of coniunctio—sites where individual development (Sun) and relational instinct (Moon) are most pressingly blended. Rudhyar supplies the vitalistic dimension, arguing that solar and lunar life-forces correspond respectively to agricultural and nomadic modes of civilisation. Von Franz recovers the alchemical intimacy of the moment: behind the closed door of the vessel, ‘the moon receives its soul from the sun.’ Moore’s Ficinian reading stresses Luna’s mediating function—reflecting solar light downward into embodied, temporal, personal experience. The composite picture is of a term whose significance is simultaneously cosmological, psychological, and initiatory.