Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Society’ functions as a contested relational field rather than a neutral descriptive category. The term is pressed into service across at least four distinct analytical registers. First, as a psychosocial matrix: Jung, Winnicott, and Fromm each insist that the individual psyche is constituted through, not merely embedded within, collective life—sentiment, character, and even pathology are shaped by the social surround. Second, as a threat to individuation: Jung’s decisive argument that the larger the community, the more moral and spiritual progress is ‘choked up’ establishes a persistent tension in the corpus between collective belonging and individual differentiation. Third, as itself susceptible to psychological diagnosis: Winnicott proposes viewing society in terms of psychiatric health or illness, while Victor Turner demonstrates that structure and communitas must remain in dialectical equilibrium lest society become pathological. Fourth, as a historically contingent formation: Alexander develops the most sustained critique, arguing that free-market society uniquely and systematically destroys psychosocial integration—the precondition of human well-being—producing mass dislocation and epidemic addiction. Across these positions, ‘Society’ is never merely backdrop; it is simultaneously the condition of psychological possibility and the primary source of psychic suffering.