The Snake Goddess occupies a significant, if unevenly theorized, position within the depth-psychology corpus. Her most sustained treatment emerges in the archaeology-adjacent mythological scholarship of Erich Neumann, Walter Burkert, and Jane Ellen Harrison, where she figures as a concrete cult object — most paradigmatically the Minoan faience statuettes from Knossos — that anchors broader arguments about matriarchal religion and the primacy of the chthonic feminine. Neumann situates the Snake Goddess within his vast phenomenology of the Great Mother archetype, reading her serpentine attributes as expressions of uroboric earth-consciousness, fertilizing phallicism, and the ambivalent transformative character of the Archetypal Feminine. Burkert, by contrast, approaches her archaeologically and iconographically, cataloguing her distribution across Creto-Mycenaean house shrines while resisting premature mythological synthesis. Harrison’s contribution is genealogical: she traces the snake’s cultic function backward from Olympian religion to more primitive chthonic daimons, the Agathos Daimon, and the household snake as precursor of heroic and divine figures. Campbell extends the figure transculturally, linking the goddess-with-serpent motif to the Sumerian Ningizzida, Kundalini symbolism, and the universal pattern of regenerative wisdom. The central tension across the corpus is between archaeological precision and archetypal generalization — whether the Snake Goddess names a specific Bronze Age religious figure or serves as a recurring psychic symbol of earth, transformation, and the pre-patriarchal feminine.