The term ‘signified’ occupies a contested and generative position across the depth-psychology corpus, operating at the intersection of structural linguistics, phenomenology, and psychoanalytic theory. Its primary Saussurean definition — the conceptual face of the linguistic sign, paired with the signifier as acoustic image — enters the corpus chiefly through Benveniste and Lacan, each of whom subjects it to critical pressure. Benveniste, working from within linguistics, challenges the simple duality of signifier/signified by proposing the notion of ‘signifiance’ as a more comprehensive account of language’s meaning-generating capacity, one that crosses the semiotic into the semantic and anchors signification in enunciation and experience. Lacan’s intervention is more radical: he famously inverts the Saussurean bar, insisting on the primacy of the signifier over the signified, severing the easy correspondence between them and thereby opening the space of the unconscious as a discourse irreducible to fixed meaning. Derrida, meanwhile, subjects the signified to its most thoroughgoing deconstruction, arguing that the classical semiology which grounds the signified in presence — as deferred but recoverable meaning — repeats the metaphysical gesture of making presence foundational. The concept thus functions as a pivot: where one locates the signified in relation to the signifier, the referent, and the subject determines the entire architecture of one’s theory of meaning, language, and psychic life.