Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘Shock’ occupies a charged semantic field that bridges cosmological, somatic, and clinical registers. The I Ching tradition, as rendered by Wilhelm and Baynes, treats Shock (Hexagram 51, Chên) as a cosmogenic force — thunder bursting from earth — whose terror is paradoxically generative: fear properly received becomes the foundation for restored order and spiritual composure. Carol K. Anthony extends this reading in an explicitly psychological direction, interpreting shock as the Cosmic hammer that fractures ego-defensiveness and forces recognition of natural limitation. The clinical strand, represented most extensively by Peter Levine, situates shock within a somatic-neurological framework: overwhelming events arrest the organism’s discharge cycle, converting mobilized survival energy into fixed, quasi-permanent paralytic states. Bessel van der Kolk’s account of inescapable shock — drawn from Maier and Seligman’s learned helplessness experiments — anchors the clinical literature in experimental neuroscience, demonstrating how uncontrollable aversive stimulation produces behavioral and neurochemical collapse. Marion Woodman’s Jungian reading mediates these poles, describing unconscious energy accumulating across a lifetime until it ‘comes through with a shock’ — either as revelation or catastrophe. Across all positions, the corpus refuses shock as mere accident; it functions instead as a threshold event whose traversal determines whether transformation or traumatic fixation ensues.