Within the depth-psychology corpus, the sheep functions as a remarkably overdetermined symbol whose valences span vulnerability, fatal passivity, herd conformity, and the theological dangers of spiritual infantilism. Von Franz furnishes the richest and most sustained treatment, reading the sheep through Saint-Exupéry’s imagery in ‘The Little Prince’ as the projected ‘fatal enemy’ of the puer aeternus: the creature that walks blindly forward (probaton, from probainō) and whose sudden emergence beneath an aviator’s wheels figures the inner catastrophe the hero refuses to see. In her fairy-tale seminars von Franz develops the negative symbolism further, linking the lamb’s extreme gregariousness and panic-driven cliff-jumping to what she calls the ‘herd person’ — the mass man who surrenders individual judgment entirely to collective momentum. This critique sharpens into theological territory when von Franz identifies the shepherd-sheep model of Christian pastoral care as a historically destructive formation that licenses intellectual abdication. Jung in the Red Book Draft radicalizes this critique, insisting that the psychotherapist who treats others as sheep violates human dignity. Benveniste and Beekes ground the symbol’s ancient semantic history, tracing probaton from generic ‘livestock’ to its restriction to sheep, and noting that the IE root for sheep (*h₃eui-) underlies vast vocabularies of wealth and pastoral economy. Auerbach’s citation of Rabelais’s Panurge episode contributes a satirical-literary register. Taken together, the corpus locates the sheep at the intersection of psychological passivity, collective coercion, and archaic economic symbolism.