Shamanic divination — the practice by which the shaman consults spirits, ancestral powers, or cosmic forces to obtain knowledge unavailable through ordinary perception — occupies a structurally significant place in the depth-psychology corpus, principally through Mircea Eliade’s foundational phenomenology of the séance. Eliade demonstrates that divination is not an incidental feature of shamanism but one of its constitutive functions: the shaman is, by definition, a master of the hidden, whose commerce with spirits yields oracular knowledge, diagnoses of illness, and revelation of cosmic will. The corpus traces specific techniques — oracular bones, drumming-as-summons, trance-induced soul-flight, ventriloqual spirit-voices, dialogue reproduced in song — across Siberian, Arctic, Central Asian, Norse, Tibetan, and Oceanic traditions, showing both the structural unity and the regional variation of the practice. Beyond Eliade, the passages suggest tensions between authenticity and simulation (Bogoras’s ventriloquism hypothesis), between archaic ecstatic forms and their later ritualized degradations, and between the epistemological status of spirit-knowledge and its psychological reinterpretation. Campbell extends the divinatory register into mythology and cosmology, while Abram locates a cognate function in the animate-landscape hermeneutics of oral peoples. The term thus serves as a crossing point between archaic religious practice, depth-psychological theory of the unconscious, and philosophy of perception.