Self-reproach occupies a contested and clinically significant position across the depth-psychology corpus, functioning simultaneously as a symptom, a defensive maneuver, a moral signal, and a vehicle of unconscious aggression. Horney provides the most sustained and nuanced analysis, distinguishing neurotic self-reproach — a destructive, self-perpetuating mechanism that beats the person down rather than clarifying genuine fault — from legitimate moral awareness. For Horney, the neurotic engages in self-accusations that are vicious precisely because they are disconnected from any reforming intention; they serve instead to reinforce alienation from the real self, undermine confidence, and forestall healthy growth. Bowlby situates self-reproach within the phenomenology of pathological mourning, identifying it as a conscious displacement of unconscious reproach directed against the lost person — a displacement with profound clinical consequences for depressive illness. Jung’s early associative research implicates self-reproach in the sexual complex, specifically linking masturbatory guilt to patterns of self-criticism and self-contempt. Lench, writing from an emotion-functional perspective, frames self-reproach as the specialized inward movement of guilt — adaptive in principle, though the corpus generally foregrounds its destructive surplus. Across these voices, the central tension is between self-reproach as moral signal and self-reproach as punitive self-attack that forecloses rather than enables growth.