Self boundary dissolution occupies a contested and multi-valent position within the depth-psychology corpus. Across phenomenological, somatic, Jungian, and psychodynamic traditions, the term designates the collapse, blurring, or radical permeabilization of the boundary that separates the self from the other, the ego from the Self, or the individual psyche from its containing environment. The literature evinces two fundamentally opposed valuations. In the spiritual-bypassing literature, particularly in the work of Robert Augustus Masters, dissolution is primarily pathological when it masquerades as transcendence: the underboundaried subject confuses collapsed boundaries with expanded ones, fusion with intimacy, and limitlessness with liberation. This misrecognition is structurally reinforced by idealized spirituality and romantic merger fantasies alike. By contrast, Yaden’s empirical and phenomenological account of self-transcendent experience treats a form of boundary dissolution — reduced self-salience alongside relational expansion — as psychologically beneficial, distinguishing the ‘annihilational’ from the ‘relational’ component. Hillman’s archetypal reading locates the boundary in senex-consciousness, where its erosion threatens the ontological conditions for symbolic life itself. Jaynes catalogues boundary loss as a clinical index of schizophrenic dissolution of mind-space. Mizen approaches the matter via projective identification, where the self boundary is literally extended to engulf the other. Together, these voices establish self boundary dissolution as simultaneously a risk, a developmental event, a mystical phenomenon, and a structural feature of psychopathology.