Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘sanity’ occupies a contested and frequently inverted position. Far from serving as a stable normative baseline, it emerges as a construction whose foundations are themselves subject to rigorous psychological interrogation. The twelve-step literature — particularly the Adult Children of Alcoholics tradition — treats sanity as something many individuals have never possessed in the first instance, having been formed within systems of dysfunction that normalized aberrant behavior; recovery, on this account, is not a restoration but a first acquisition. Hillman, characteristically, goes further: he frames sanity itself as a fantasy of the senex complex, a defensive fiction maintained against the madness inherent in every archetype, and proposes that genuine psychological health requires dissolving the very illusion of sanity rather than fortifying it. Yalom, drawing on Cervantes, identifies the existential dilemma between ‘wise madness’ and ‘foolish sanity,’ ultimately rejecting both poles in favor of courageous engagement with reality. The twelve-step tradition further frames insanity as the defining feature of addictive behavior — specifically the ‘peculiar mental twist’ that renders the first drink logical — and positions a Higher Power as the agent of restoration. Collectively, these voices expose sanity not as a natural state to be reclaimed but as a psychic achievement, a normative ideal, or in the most radical formulations, a sophisticated self-deception.