Royalty

the analysis of the term kúbdos opens up a domain into which we are rarely introduced by Greek terms, that of the magical powers of royalty. In the most ancient world of Indo-European concepts the king had a role which was both political and magical.

Benveniste argues that the Greek term kudos unlocks the archaic Indo-European conception of kingship as simultaneously political authority and magical power, with the king mediating between human community and divine force.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Thus in rex we must see not so much the ‘sovereign’ as the one who traces out the line, the way which must be followed, which also represents what is right. The Indo-European rex was much more a religious than a polit

Benveniste redefines Indo-European kingship through the root reg-, establishing that the rex was fundamentally a religious officer whose authority consisted in tracing sacred boundaries rather than exercising political domination.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

He acts as a metaphor for what we reverence, for the divine in the human. This metaphoric essence of royalty depends on the accidental qualities of the individual being submerged in the uniqueness of the role.

McGilchrist reads royalty as a living metaphor in which the person of the king is dissolved into the sacred function, making the institution a vehicle for the divine rather than a merely political office.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, 2009thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

‘royalty’ introduces a conception of power which is different: the authority of the king is that of the guide, of the ‘shepherd’ and we find it in Iranian, in Hittite, as well as in Homeric Greek.

Benveniste distinguishes the shepherd-king conception of royal authority — found across Iranian, Hittite, and Homeric traditions — from the war-band chieftainship of the Lāwāgetās, emphasising the guiding rather than merely commanding dimension of kingship.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Among the Scandinavians the king ensures prosperity on land and sea; his reign is characterized by an abundance of fruits and the fecundity of women. He is asked, according to a consecrated formula, for ár ok friðr ‘abundance and peace’.

Benveniste demonstrates across Germanic, Persian, and Greek evidence that the king’s sacral role encompassed cosmic responsibility for agricultural fertility, peace, and communal prosperity, with ritual punishment reserved for kings who failed this function.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Persian is the only Iranian language which possesses certain terms relating to royalty. Among them is the adjective of Old Persian vazraka ‘great’ … the royal protocol, repeated immutably after the name of the sovereign, in his three titles: ‘Great King,’ ‘King of Kings,’ ‘King of the Countries.’

Benveniste shows that the elaborate Achaemenid titulature — ‘Great King, King of Kings, King of the Countries’ — represents a uniquely Persian elaboration of royal vocabulary that directly influenced Greek conceptualisations of monarchical authority.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This term enters into a formula which is characteristic of the Achaemenid titulature, xšāyaθiya xšāyaθiyānām ‘Kings of Kings’. This is a curious expression, which does not mean ‘king among kings’ but ‘he who reigns over other kings.’ It is a suzerainty, a kingship of the second degree.

Benveniste analyses the Achaemenid formula ‘King of Kings’ as encoding a suzerain relation — a meta-kingship over subordinate kings — and traces the probable Median origin of this Persian royal title.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

This has been called a bureaucratic royalty. Though the connotations of the term are much too modern, it emphasizes one aspect of a system that is led by its own logic to a control more and more rigorous, more and more oppressive.

Vernant characterises Mycenaean palace-centred power as a ‘bureaucratic royalty’ — a totalising redistributive system qualitatively different from later Greek political forms — and connects its collapse to the origins of democratic thought.

Jean-Pierre Vernant, The Origins of Greek Thought, 1982supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The Indian ceremony of the consecration of a king, the rājasuya, ‘is only the terrestrial reproduction of the ancient consecration which Varuna, the first Sovereign, performed for his own benefit’.

Eliade presents the Vedic royal consecration ritual as an archetypally regenerative act in which the king re-enacts the primordial sovereignty of Varuna, collapsing historical inauguration into mythic precedent.

Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History, 1954supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The Crisis of Sovereignty. The collapse of Mycenaean power and the spread of the Dorians throughout the Peloponnesos … inaugurated a new age for Greek civilization.

Vernant frames the Dorian collapse of Mycenaean kingship as a ‘Crisis of Sovereignty’ that structurally enabled the Greek transition from palace-centred royal power to the open political space of the polis.

Jean-Pierre Vernant, The Origins of Greek Thought, 1982supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

We should certainly know more of the worship of ancestors among the ancient royal families if in nearly all the Greek states monarchy had not been abolished at an early period … When a Spartan king died … honour was paid to him, in Xenophon’s words, not as a man, but as a Hero.

Rohde argues that Spartan royal hero-cult preserves an archaic pan-Greek practice linking kingship to ancestor worship, a connection largely suppressed elsewhere by the early abolition of monarchy.

Rohde, Erwin, Psyche: The Cult of Souls and the Belief in Immortality among the Greeks, 1894supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Kúbdos, a term almost exclusively confined to the epic, which has been regarded by ancient and modern scholars as a synonym of kléos ‘glory,’ ‘renown,’ has in fact a quite specific sense: it designates a magic power that is irresistible and is the apanage of the gods.

Benveniste distinguishes kudos from glory or renown, defining it as an irresistible divine magic power that gods selectively grant to warriors and kings, constituting a key component of the sacral dimension of royal charisma.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It is not a simple accident of history if in the ‘intermediate’ languages, we find no trace of this word for ‘king.’ In the case of both Indo-Iranian and Italo-Celtic we are concerned with societies of the same archaic structure … where institutions and their vocabulary persisted long after they had been abolished elsewhere.

Benveniste explains the uneven distribution of royal vocabulary across Indo-European languages by the preserving function of powerful priestly colleges — Brahmans, Druids, Magi — who maintained archaic institutional vocabulary after political monarchy dissolved.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

We know the importance of the scepter for the Homeric kingship, since the kings are defined as ‘scepter-bearers’: σκηπτοῦχοι βασιλῆες.

Benveniste examines the sceptre as the defining emblem of Homeric royalty, tracing its absence from Iranian and Vedic traditions to argue that it was specifically a Greek (and ultimately Mycenaean) materialisation of royal authority.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The act of sanctioning is indicated by a movement of the head … ‘Zeus gave a sign with his head (epéneuse) and ratified (ekrḗēnen) his wish.’ … this human power is defined by the gesture which indicates divine assent.

Benveniste traces the verb kraínō (‘to exercise royal authority’) to a bodily gesture of divine ratification — a nod of the head — showing that human royal authority was conceived as the earthly extension of divine assent.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Book IV: Royalty and Its Privileges rex xsay- and Iran

The table of contents of Benveniste’s Indo-European Language and Society identifies ‘Royalty and Its Privileges’ as a distinct structural division of the work, signalling the centrality of royal vocabulary to the overall comparative enterprise.

Benveniste, Émile, Indo European Language and Society, 1973aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

we find the basileus overseeing the distribution of allotments of bronze to the blacksmiths in his territory, who were in the palace’s employ.

Vernant illustrates how the Mycenaean basileus functioned as an administrative agent of palace redistribution, contextualising early royal power within an economic rather than purely sacral framework.

Jean-Pierre Vernant, The Origins of Greek Thought, 1982aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →