Rome in the depth-psychology and comparative-religion corpus occupies a remarkably polysemous position, functioning simultaneously as imperial power, mythological origin-site, ecclesiastical centre, and eschatological symbol. The most psychologically charged treatments appear in the context of the Book of Revelation, where Thielman reads Rome as the ‘great prostitute’ — a figure dense with biblical typology linking imperial corruption to the Jezebel archetype and prophetic adultery imagery. Nietzsche’s genealogical reading sharpens the tension: Rome represents the noble, strong, life-affirming pole in his master-morality schema, standing in irreducible conflict with the Judaic-Christian spirit of ressentiment. Campbell traces Rome’s mythological foundations through the Romulus legend, attending to the Roman concept of numen as immanent divine will, and situates the Augustan renewal within Sibylline cyclical cosmology. Eliade reads Rome’s imperial mythology as a response to anxiety about cosmic cycles — Augustus as the figure who arrests the iron age’s descent without ekpyrosis. For Campbell in ecclesiastical history, Rome represents hierarchical authority whose dissolution is prophesied by Joachimite and later heterodox movements. Dvornik’s treatment concerns the institutional Rome of papal primacy in the Photian Schism. The term thus gathers political theology, mythic founding, cyclical time, and the psychology of power into a single overdetermined node.