Ritual Obligation occupies a persistent and structurally significant position across the depth-psychology corpus, appearing not as a peripheral curiosity but as a mechanism through which psychic, social, and cosmological order is simultaneously maintained and renewed. The literature positions ritual obligation at the intersection of compulsion and meaning: it is the force that commands participation in sacrificial, funerary, initiatory, and purificatory rites, binding individuals to communities, the living to the dead, and mortals to the divine. Burkert’s ethological reading treats obligation as biologically inscribed behavior stylized into cultural form, while Turner’s field observations reveal obligation as socially negotiated and crisis-driven. Benveniste’s linguistic analyses trace the proto-Indo-European roots of sacred vow and oath, demonstrating that obligation’s formal enunciation is itself constitutive of the sacred bond. Campbell situates the obligation within mythic recurrence — the duty of each generation to repeat the founding act. For depth psychology proper, ritual obligation carries the weight of individuation’s demands: it is the psyche’s insistence that interior transformation be enacted in external, embodied form. Moore and Johnson articulate this as the necessity of physical performance to register psychic change at somatic depth. The central tension in the corpus is between obligation as coercive conformity to collective norms and obligation as authentic response to an archetypal imperative — a distinction that remains productively unresolved throughout.