Right Hemisphere Development

Within the depth-psychology corpus, right hemisphere development designates the ontogenetic and phylogenetic priority of the right cerebral hemisphere in establishing the foundational architecture of selfhood, emotion, attachment, and social cognition. Allan Schore’s neurobiological work stands as the locus classicus: drawing on orbitofrontal growth data, he argues that the right hemisphere matures earlier than the left and that the critical period of mother-infant dyadic interaction — roughly the first two years of life — drives the experience-dependent sculpting of right orbitofrontal cortex, which he identifies as the crucible of the emergent self. This argument is convergently endorsed by Iain McGilchrist, who situates right-hemisphere developmental primacy within a broader evolutionary thesis: the right hemisphere is not merely early-developing but constitutively more important, its priority reflecting a deeper truth about the nature of reality-engagement. Daniel Siegel contributes a relational-neuroscientific dimension, linking brain asymmetry to the interpersonal transmission of mental-state awareness. The tension animating the corpus is whether right-hemisphere developmental precedence is primarily a neuroanatomical datum (Schore), an epistemological claim about the superior fidelity of right-hemisphere modes to lived reality (McGilchrist), or a relational-systemic phenomenon inseparable from attachment patterning (Siegel). Clinically, the consequences are substantial: disruptions to early right-hemisphere development are implicated in affect dysregulation, insecure attachment, and vulnerability to relational trauma.

In the library 11 passages

The right hemisphere matures earlier than the left, and is more involved than the left in almost every aspect of the development of mental functioning in early childhood, and of the self as a social, empathic being.

McGilchrist establishes the developmental primacy of the right hemisphere, linking its earlier maturation to the emergence of social, empathic selfhood and citing Allan Schore’s identification of the right orbitofrontal cortex as the crucible of the growing self.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World, 2009thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The early post-natal growth of the orbitofrontal area, a region known to be involved in homeostatic regulation and attachment functions, is particularly active in the right cerebral hemisphere, the hemisphere that is thought to contribute to the development of reciprocal interactions within the mother-infant regulatory system.

Schore identifies the right orbitofrontal cortex as the site of experience-dependent post-natal growth that underlies both homeostatic regulation and the mother-infant attachment system, grounding right hemisphere developmental primacy in neuroanatomical specificity.

Schore, Allan N., Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

A neuroanatomic study of avian imprinting shows consequent structural changes (synapse formation) occur very rapidly first in the right hemisphere; then, with further experiences, the left hemisphere ‘catches up’.

Schore draws on avian imprinting research to argue that synaptic structural change in response to early experience occurs first in the right hemisphere, establishing a cross-species principle for the developmental priority of the right brain.

Schore, Allan N., Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the neural circuitry of the infant’s developing stress system that responds to early life trauma is located in the early developing right brain

This passage confirms that early-life relational trauma impacts the infant’s stress system specifically through the early-developing right brain, supporting Schore’s thesis about the right hemisphere’s developmental priority and clinical vulnerability.

Lanius, edited by Ruth A, The impact of early life trauma on health and disease the, 2010supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

After severe infantile damage to the left hemisphere, language can develop in the right hemisphere; but the left hemisphere is more rarely able to take over after damage to the right.

McGilchrist argues that the developmental asymmetry between hemispheres is clinically confirmed by plasticity data: the right hemisphere can compensate for left-hemisphere damage far more readily than the reverse, attesting to its foundational developmental role.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

After severe infantile damage to the left hemisphere, language can develop in the right hemisphere; but the left hemisphere is more rarely able to take over after damage to the right.

Parallel passage reinforcing that developmental flexibility flows predominantly from right to left, not the reverse, underscoring the right hemisphere’s ontogenetic priority.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Cognitive and voluntary processes that attain maturity only after many years and that have special importance in cultural life tend to be asymmetric in the brain. The basis for this asymmetry seems to be set down very early, probably in fetal stages.

Siegel, citing Trevarthen, argues that the brain’s functional asymmetries — relevant to both cognitive development and cultural participation — are established from fetal stages, lending developmental depth to the right-hemisphere primacy thesis.

Siegel, Daniel J., The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are, 2020supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Both anterior temporal and orbitofrontal association cortices show the highest concentration of dopamine and opioid peptides in the cerebral cortex, are innervated by the mesocortical dopamine circuit

Schore details the neurochemical substrate — dopaminergic and opioid systems concentrated in right orbitofrontal and anterior temporal cortex — that makes the early-developing right hemisphere uniquely sensitive to affective stimulation during the critical period.

Schore, Allan N., Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobiology of Emotional Development, 1994supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The brain responds to experience by altering its neural circuitry. These studies suggest that the brain responds to experience by altering its neural circuitry; that it is capable of devoting its circuitry to alternative sensory modes depending on stimulus input

Siegel articulates the general principle of experience-dependent neural plasticity that underlies right hemisphere developmental arguments, though without specifying hemispheric laterality in this passage.

Siegel, Daniel J., The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are, 2020aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Weintraub S & Mesulam M-M, ‘Developmental learning disabilities of the right hemisphere: emotional, interpersonal, and cognitive components’

This bibliographic entry references the Weintraub-Mesulam account of right-hemisphere developmental learning disabilities, acknowledging the clinical corollary that failures of right hemisphere development manifest in emotional, interpersonal, and cognitive deficits.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms