Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘rescue’ operates on at least four distinct registers that rarely collapse into one another: the somatic-clinical, the archetypal-mythological, the relational-transferential, and the spiritual-devotional. Clinically, rescue appears most prominently in trauma literature as a complex transference phenomenon—Ogden notes that the wish for rescue manifests in childlike somatic organization long before it can be verbally articulated, while Herman’s work on prolonged abuse situates rescue fantasies within the broader terrain of helplessness and complex PTSD. Levine’s first-person accident narrative dramatizes rescue as an intersubjective event mediated by bodily co-regulation rather than heroic intervention, foregrounding the parasympathetic dimension of being-rescued. In the archetypal register, Addenbrooke reads the Lost Child’s search for the Good Mother as a recursive chain of rescues operating simultaneously at personal, familial, and intrapsychic levels, while Hillman deploys the term metaphorically in alchemical psychology to describe the opus that retrieves the soul from the sterility of pure introspection. The ACA literature transforms rescue into a pathological relational pattern—‘we confused love with pity, tending to love those we could rescue’—mapping it onto the codependent compulsion originating in dysfunctional families. Plato’s civic-legal usage provides an ancient counterpoint: rescue as social obligation carrying precise penalties for non-compliance. Across these registers, the corpus consistently treats rescue as a threshold concept marking the boundary between helplessness and agency, dependency and autonomy.