Within the depth-psychology and psychology-of-religion corpus, religiousness emerges not as a unified construct but as a contested, multidimensional phenomenon whose psychological significance depends entirely on how it is measured and theorized. Pargament's foundational work establishes the term's empirical complexity: religiousness ranges across behavioral indices (church attendance, prayer frequency), motivational orientations (intrinsic versus extrinsic, following Allport), doctrinal commitments, and self-rated salience—each yielding different, often contradictory, relationships with coping and wellbeing. A persistent tension runs through the literature between religiousness as institutionally anchored practice and spirituality as an individualized, interior process; the corpus records an accelerating scholarly preference for the latter, reflecting broader cultural individualism. In the addiction and recovery literature, Benda, McGovern, and Laudet demonstrate that religiousness—when defined by the Fetzer Institute's behavioral-social-doctrinal framework—functions as a measurable protective factor against substance use, though its unique variance remains modest. Critically, the corpus insists that religiousness can both facilitate and impede adaptive coping: it buffers mortality risk among the elderly ill, moderates adolescent substance use, and supports recovery quality of life, yet it also underwrites passivity, undifferentiated compliance, and prejudice under fundamentalist conditions. The field's methodological challenge is that no single measure captures the term's range.
In the library
19 substantive passages
Religiousness has specific behavioral, social, doctrinal, and denominational characteristics because it involves a system of worship and doctrine that is shared wi
Adopting the Fetzer Institute definition, this passage establishes religiousness as a structurally bounded, collectively shared system distinct from the more diffuse construct of spirituality.
Benda, Brent B., Spirituality and Religiousness and Alcohol/Other Drug Problems: Treatment and Recovery Perspectives, 2006thesis
in developmental models of religiousness, social forms of religion have been defined as 'psychologically primitive' and personal forms of religion, autonomous from religious institutions, have been defined as most advanced
Pargament critiques the dominant developmental bias in religiousness research, which systematically devalues institutional practice in favor of individualized spirituality.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001thesis
In his conception of intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness, Allport forces the individual's hand. You must make a decision, he says. Choose the faith or choose yourself.
Pargament challenges Allport's intrinsic/extrinsic dichotomy, arguing that the forced opposition between self-serving and faith-oriented religiousness misrepresents the actual complexity of religious motivation.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001thesis
The amount of unique variance explained by religiousness is 2.5 percent in alcohol use, 3 percent in use of other drugs, and 3.4 percent in delinquency. The only significant interaction showed that females were more impacted by religiousness than were males
Empirical analysis demonstrates that religiousness exerts a modest but statistically significant protective effect on adolescent substance use and delinquency, with gender moderating the relationship.
Benda, Brent B., Spirituality and Religiousness and Alcohol/Other Drug Problems: Treatment and Recovery Perspectives, 2006thesis
a general measure of religiousness (e.g., self-rated religiousness and church attendance) moderated the effects of illness on mortality over the next 2 years
Religiousness functions as a stress moderator in longitudinal studies, buffering the mortality impact of illness among elderly poor populations.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
The themes and patterns of spirituality-religiousness are explored, in their relevance to the treatment and recovery from alcohol-other drug problems, in this volume.
McGovern and Benda position religiousness as integral—not merely supplementary—to understanding addiction as a disease and recovery as a transformative process.
Benda, Brent B., Spirituality and Religiousness and Alcohol/Other Drug Problems: Treatment and Recovery Perspectives, 2006thesis
religious involvement may encompass negative experiences as well. In response to trying circumstances, some individuals may derive a sense of comfort or meaning from their faith; others, however, might struggle with perceived abandonment, doubt, or alienation.
Religiousness is bifurcated into positive and negative dimensions, with religious struggle identified as a distinct construct tied to emotional distress rather than wellbeing.
Benda, Brent B., Spirituality and Religiousness and Alcohol/Other Drug Problems: Treatment and Recovery Perspectives, 2006supporting
Suicidal ideation was related to lower self-rated religiousness (r = -.39), less orthodoxy (r = -.24), and less belief in supreme being (r = -.40).
Self-rated religiousness correlates inversely with suicidal ideation across multiple indicators, supporting its role as a protective factor in severe psychological distress.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
the extrinsically motivated person uses his religion, whereas the intrinsically motivated lives his religion
Allport's canonical distinction between means-oriented and ends-oriented religiousness remains the foundational typological framework for empirical psychology-of-religion research.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
Congregation members who involved religion in coping were more religious in several ways. They prayed and attended church more frequently; they reported closer feelings to God and more loving images of the deity
Religiousness functions as a cumulative resource: those with deeper religious embeddedness are more likely to mobilize religious coping strategies when confronted with stressors.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
Assessment and measurement of spirituality and religiousness, together with the various domains or attributes associated with both constructs, are indispensable elements of research in the AOD field.
Reliable instrumentation for measuring religiousness is identified as a methodological prerequisite for advancing clinical research in addiction and recovery.
Benda, Brent B., Spirituality and Religiousness and Alcohol/Other Drug Problems: Treatment and Recovery Perspectives, 2006supporting
The undifferentiated religious system proves to be a burden in coping because it is incapable of generating an adequate repertoire of responses to the full range of life events.
Undifferentiated religiousness—characterized by rigid, monolithic belief—impairs adaptive coping by restricting the range of available psychological responses.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
the affirmation of life in relationship with God, self, community and environment
In recovery research, religiousness is operationalized through spiritual well-being scales that capture its relational and communal dimensions alongside personal belief.
Laudet, Alexandre B., The Role of Social Supports, Spirituality, Religiousness, Life Meaning and Affiliation with 12-Step Fellowships in Quality of Life Satisfaction Among Individuals in Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems, 2006supporting
some (but not all) aspects of religion are significantly tied to some (but not all) aspects of outcome
The empirical relationship between religiousness and coping outcomes is characterized by systematic inconsistency, requiring dimensional rather than global measurement approaches.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
some religious pathways are better constructed than others, some religious destinations are more viable than others, and some pathways are better suited to some destinations than others
Religiousness is evaluated not in the abstract but functionally: its value depends on the coherence between the means and ends it offers individuals navigating life's demands.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
lower levels of 'religious questing' have been associated with higher levels of prejudice in several studies
Certain expressions of religiousness—particularly fundamentalist rigidity combined with low quest orientation—are empirically associated with heightened prejudice and social inflexibility.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
Religion means different things to different people... people described in these profiles varied along several dimensions, such as how frequently they attend church services, whether they hold traditional Christian beliefs, their feelings of closeness to God
An idiographic approach reveals that lay conceptions of religiousness are multidimensional and resist reduction to any single behavioral or doctrinal indicator.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001supporting
Benda and McGovern provide CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT SPIRITUALITY AND RELIGIOUSNESS ARE NOT ONLY RELEVANT, BUT INTEGRAL to our understanding the disease of addiction and the process of recovery.
The volume's reception positions religiousness as a central rather than peripheral variable in the clinical conceptualization of addiction and recovery.
Benda, Brent B., Spirituality and Religiousness and Alcohol/Other Drug Problems: Treatment and Recovery Perspectives, 2006aside
God, she said, had come to her in a dream and told her to return to her husband... Ellen was confident that God would change him.
A clinical case illustrates how religiousness can underwrite passive, avoidant coping by legitimating inaction through divine attribution, resulting in maladaptive outcomes.
Pargament, Kenneth I, The psychology of religion and coping theory, research,, 2001aside