Relativization Of Ego

The relativization of ego stands as one of the structuring concepts of post-Jungian depth psychology, marking the decisive shift from a model in which ego-consciousness functions as the sovereign center of the personality to one in which it is understood as subordinate to—and encompassed by—the larger totality Jung called the Self. Jung's own formulation, drawn most precisely from the Collected Works, is clinical and epistemological at once: the empirical discovery of a psyche extending beyond consciousness has rendered the ego's formerly 'absolute' position untenable. What was once treated as the whole of the psyche is now recognized as 'part of the personality but not the whole of it.' Edinger develops this insight developmentally, charting the oscillating cycle of ego-Self separation and reunion that constitutes individuation. Hillman and the archetypal school radicalize the move, treating the desubstantiation and 'radical relativization' of ego not merely as a therapeutic corrective but as a programmatic cultural and philosophical project that distinguishes archetypal psychology from orthodox Jungianism. Jung himself insists on a crucial limit: the relativization must not be carried so far that the ego is dissolved entirely, for consciousness remains the indispensable locus of realization. Clarke illuminates the parallel Copernican revolution implicit in Jung's reformulation: the ego now revolves around the Self as the earth around the sun. The concept thus marks a fault line between Western ego-psychology and contemplative traditions—a tension the corpus explores but never fully resolves.

In the library 14 passages

this was an attempt to bring to consciousness a standpoint outside the ego, involving a relativization of the ego and its contents... the position of the ego, till then absolute, became relativized.... It is part of the personality but not the whole of it.

This passage, drawing directly on Jung's Collected Works, supplies the canonical Jungian formulation: the empirical discovery of the unconscious has definitively ended the ego's claim to absolute centrality, making relativization both a historical and a psychological fact.

Hillman, James, Anima: An Anatomy of a Personified Notion, 1985thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the radical relativization and desubstantiation of the ego – will be discussed below.

Goldenberg's review of archetypal psychology identifies 'radical relativization and desubstantiation of the ego' as one of two defining programmatic themes that distinguish this movement from its Jungian source.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology, 1983thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the radical relativization and desubstantiation of the ego – will be discussed below.

Parallel to the prior passage, this text confirms the centrality of ego-relativization as a founding orientation of archetypal psychology as a cultural and therapeutic movement.

Hillman, James, Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account, 1983thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

it is merely the one-sided over-valuation of the latter that has to be checked by a certain relativization of values. But this relativi­zation should not be carried so far that the ego is complete

Jung formulates the necessary limit of relativization: the ego's over-valuation must be corrected, but the corrective must stop short of the ego's annihilation, preserving the conscious subject as witness to transformation.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Practice of Psychotherapy: Essays on the Psychology of the Transference and Other Subjects, 1954thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

It involves a sort of 'Copernican revolution' in which the ego, from being seen as the centre of the psychic universe, revolves round the self in the way that the earth revolves round the sun.

Clarke characterizes Jung's restructuring of the psyche as a Copernican revolution, explicitly naming the shift from ego-centered to Self-centered orientation as the heart of the relativization.

Clarke, J. J., Jung and Eastern Thought: A Dialogue with the Orient, 1994thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

The ego is, by definition, subordinate to the self and is related to it like a part to the whole... the self acts upon the ego like an objective occurrence which free will can do very little to alter.

Jung's Aion provides the structural basis for relativization: the ego is constitutively subordinate to the Self, which acts upon it as an autonomous, objective force beyond willful control.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self, 1951thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

accentuation of the ego personality and the world of consciousness may easily assume such proportions that the figures of the unconscious are psychologized and the self consequently becomes assimilated to the ego... the world of consciousness must now be levelled down in favour of the reality of the unconscious.

Jung identifies inflation as the pathological inversion of relativization—when the ego absorbs the Self rather than submitting to it—and prescribes 'levelling down' of consciousness as the therapeutic response.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self, 1951supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

a corresponding relativization of the ego position in natural science. Cases of multiple personality were important because they confirmed the multiplicty of the individual.

Hillman situates the relativization of ego within a broader historical and cultural context, linking the fragmentation of the unified ego in psychology to parallel developments in natural science and modernist culture.

Hillman, James, Re-Visioning Psychology, 1975supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

a process in which the ego becomes increasingly aware of its origin from and dependence upon the archetypal psyche.

Edinger frames individuation as the developmental process through which the ego comes to recognize its derivative and dependent status—the experiential counterpart of the theoretical relativization.

Edinger, Edward F., Ego and Archetype: Individuation and the Religious Function of the Psyche, 1972supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

self-realization takes place so as the ego comes to function in an 'ex-centric' manner in the service of the Self. Jung refers to this psychological state as 'an ego-less mental condition,' 'consciousness without an ego.'

Spiegelman maps the Buddhist doctrine of ego-transcendence onto Jung's concept of the relativized ego functioning 'ex-centrically,' showing the convergence—and tension—between Eastern egolessness and Jungian relativization.

Spiegelman, J. Marvin, Buddhism and Jungian Psychology, 1985supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

when secondary personalization seeks to assert itself by devaluing the transpersonal forces, it produces a dangerous overvaluation of the ego. It is a typical false constellation of the modern mind.

Neumann identifies the refusal of relativization—the defensive 'secondary personalization' that dismisses transpersonal forces—as the characteristic pathology of modern Western ego-consciousness.

Neumann, Erich, The Origins and History of Consciousness (Princeton, 2019supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

There suddenly comes a realization of how precious time is just because it is limited. Such an experience not uncommonly gives a whole new orientation to life.

Edinger illustrates how confrontation with mortality functions as an involuntary agent of ego-relativization, shattering the inflation of immortality and reorienting the individual toward the limits proper to human existence.

Edinger, Edward F., Ego and Archetype: Individuation and the Religious Function of the Psyche, 1972supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the central aim of all religious practices is to keep the individual (ego) related to the deity (Self). All religions are repositories of transpersonal experience and archetypal images.

Edinger argues that traditional religious practice serves the psychological function of maintaining the ego in proper subordinate relation to the Self—the institutionalized form of relativization.

Edinger, Edward F., Ego and Archetype: Individuation and the Religious Function of the Psyche, 1972supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

dominants of, 325, 358ff, 367, 369f, 379 —, binding force of, 368 —, Christian, 331 —, decay of, 362 —, historical, 370 —, mythical, 369 —, negative aspect of, 380 —, relativization of, 325

The Mysterium Coniunctionis index records 'relativization of consciousness' as a discrete topic, confirming that the concept carries systematic weight throughout Jung's alchemical writings.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Mysterium Coniunctionis: An Inquiry into the Separation and Synthesis of Psychic Opposites in Alchemy, 1955aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms