Within the depth-psychology corpus, ‘rejection’ occupies a position at the intersection of developmental wounding, neurotic structure, somatic response, and archetypal narrative. The concept is not treated as a single discrete event but as a constitutive relational experience whose reverberations shape character, bodily states, and psychic economy across the lifespan. Horney illuminates how, in the compliant neurotic type, any perceived rejection of one’s lovable qualities becomes a total rejection of self — a dynamic rooted in the developmental conflation of worth with affection. Schore approaches rejection neurobiologically, linking parental facial expressions of disgust and contempt to shame, humiliation, and narcissistic rage in the infant, thus grounding rejection in the earliest regulatory matrices of self. Dayton extends this into the social-pain literature, showing that rejection activates the same neural pain centers as physical injury, a finding that renders the metaphors of ‘broken heart’ and ‘heartache’ literally accurate. Against these clinical accounts, theological and mythological registers in the corpus — Pascal, Thielman, Edinger — treat rejection as a providential or archetypal motif: the stone rejected by builders that becomes the cornerstone, the Chosen People as simultaneously elected and repudiated, the Suffering Servant whose rejection fulfills divine design. Berger grounds rejection in failures of self-protection and borrowed self-esteem. The term thus spans neurobiological, psychodynamic, mythological, and soteriological registers, with the common thread being the catastrophic meaning the psyche assigns to being turned away.