Receptive Consciousness, catalogued in the depth-psychology corpus under the alias ‘feminine,’ occupies a contested but richly elaborated position across the literature. The term designates a mode of awareness characterized by openness, yielding, and non-directive attentiveness — a quality distinguishable from active, assertive, or goal-directed cognition and consistently counterposed to the so-called masculine principle of penetrating, linear mentation. The corpus reveals at least three distinct theoretical registers in which this concept operates. First, cosmological: in Wilhelm’s rendition of the I Ching, the yielding broken line (yin) figures receptivity as a cosmic principle of rest and dark-correspondence, antithetical to but interdependent with the creative-active principle. Second, archetypal-psychological: Neumann, Woodman, and Hillman treat receptive consciousness as a specific psychic orientation associated with the Feminine archetype, one that depth psychology regards as chronically suppressed under patriarchal structures and in need of deliberate rehabilitation. Third, integrative-relational: Siegel recasts receptive awareness in neurobiological and attachment terms, linking it to ‘presence,’ mindful integration, and secure relational functioning. Central tensions include whether receptive consciousness names a universal psychic capacity or a gendered ontological mode, whether its ‘femininity’ is archetypal or culturally constructed, and whether its recovery constitutes individuation or a regression to undifferentiated merger. The stakes are high: across authors, the atrophy of receptive consciousness is diagnostically implicated in addiction, eating disorders, and the disconnection of psyche from soma.