Within the depth-psychology and comparative-mythology corpus assembled under the Seba library, ‘Race’ operates along two largely non-overlapping axes. The first and most extensively documented is the cosmogonic-mythological axis, where ‘race’ denotes the successive generations or kinds of humanity catalogued in Hesiod’s Works and Days — the races of gold, silver, bronze, heroes, and iron — and where Jean-Pierre Vernant’s structuralist analysis stands as the dominant interpretive voice. Vernant reads these races not as stages in linear decline but as paired functional oppositions organized around the polarities of dike and hubris, with each race defined relationally rather than in isolation. Kerényi corroborates this reading by attending to the cosmological architecture that places the divine race alongside the mortal one. The second axis — modern sociopolitical — is represented only fragmentarily, primarily through the text misattributed to Hannah but clearly drawn from scholarly commentary on Voegelin and Arendt, which identifies four analytical levels in the race concept (empirical, political, explanatory, philosophical) and traces how nineteenth-century biologism narrowed what had been a complex body-mind-spirit category. Athletic ‘races’ — chariot contests, foot races, wrestling bouts at Patroclus’s funeral games — appear extensively in Homer and constitute a third, largely literal usage. The tension between myth, sociology, and competitive performance gives the concordance entry its unusual breadth.