Within the depth-psychology corpus, quantum physics functions not as mere scientific backdrop but as an epistemological mirror held up to the psyche itself. The literature divides broadly into three registers. First, there is the technical-philosophical register exemplified by Wolfgang Pauli, whose writings engage the formal structures of complementarity, the exclusion principle, and the observer-system problem with the precision of a physicist who also grasps their psychological resonance—particularly the analogy between the indeterminacy introduced by atomic measurement and the disturbance wrought by psychological observation upon the unconscious. Second, a synthetic register emerges in authors such as Ponte and Schäfer, von Franz, and Romanyshyn, who draw explicit structural homologies between Jungian ontology—the psychoid, synchronicity, the collective unconscious—and quantum-physical discoveries about probability fields, non-locality, and the role of the observer. Third, thinkers like McGilchrist and Simondon treat quantum theory as evidence that reality is constitutively continuous-yet-discontinuous, relational, and resistant to classical objectification—conclusions that support broader arguments about the nature of mind and Being. The central tension running through all three registers is whether the quantum-psychological parallel is formal analogy, deep structural identity, or speculative overreach. Pauli himself refused to resolve this tension, maintaining it as a productive aporia. That restraint has not always been preserved by later inheritors.