Psychophysical Research occupies a foundational, if chronologically early, position in the depth-psychology corpus. It designates the program of empirical investigations — anchored in Jung’s Burghölzli years — that sought to correlate measurable somatic indices (galvanometric deflection, pneumographic respiration curves, reaction-time latencies) with the activity of emotionally charged complexes in the psyche. The word-association experiment furnished the experimental armature; the galvanometer and pneumograph furnished the body’s unwitting testimony. What distinguishes this program from conventional physiological psychology is its governing assumption: that psyche and soma speak a common language, that an unconscious affective constellation will inscribe itself upon the body before consciousness registers it at all. Jung’s collaborations with Peterson and Ricksher formalized this interdisciplinary methodology, yielding data on normal subjects, psychiatric patients, and criminal cases alike. The theoretical stakes, however, far exceeded the empirical results. Psychophysical research planted the seed for Jung’s later, more speculative engagements — the psychoid archetype, synchronicity, the unus mundus — in which the boundary between mental and material is not merely porous but ultimately dissolves. Von Franz and Neumann, each in distinct registers, inherit this problematic: the former pressing it toward synchronistic physics, the latter toward an ontology of psychophysical unity at the uroboric stratum of consciousness. The tension between a rigorous, instrument-based methodology and a metaphysically ambitious hypothesis of mind-matter identity defines the intellectual arc of this term across the corpus.