Psychic intervention occupies a contested but structurally indispensable position across the depth-psychology corpus. Its range is striking: from E. R. Dodds’s philological reconstruction of the Homeric daemonic—where anonymous supernatural agencies interrupt normal consciousness, inserting recognition, insight, or loss of judgment into the otherwise causal stream of human behavior—to James Hillman’s archetypal reformulation, in which Eros himself operates as a force of ‘psychic interference or intervention’ that interrupts, redirects, and symbolizes behavioral sequences, opening the inner space of imagination. Aurobindo extends the concept onto an evolutionary canvas, reading the intrusion of the conscious Spirit into nature’s gradual unfolding as precisely the kind of accelerated intervention that transforms the very tempo of development; his account of the supramental force imposes a new ‘dynamic principle’ upon the lower members of being. Grof’s clinical literature addresses a more literal register: crisis intervention during LSD psychotherapy, where the therapeutic management of a paranoid subject demands tactical psychic presence. The term thus migrates between ontological, mythological, clinical, and evolutionary frameworks. The key tension is between intervention understood as an irruption from beyond the ego—divine, daemonic, archetypal—and intervention as a deliberate therapeutic act upon psychic process. What unites these registers is a shared assumption that the ordinary causal sequence of psychic life can be broken into, that something ‘other’ redirects the trajectory of consciousness, and that this interruption is constitutive rather than merely disruptive.