Psychic Entanglement

Psychic Entanglement occupies a conceptually fertile yet theoretically unstable position in the depth-psychology corpus. The term names the condition in which psychic processes — whether within a single individual, between persons, or between psyche and world — become so interpenetrated that discrete boundaries dissolve and autonomous functioning is compromised or transformed. The corpus approaches this phenomenon from at least three distinct angles. The first, rooted in Jung’s own clinical and alchemical writings, treats entanglement as a condition of ego-inflation, possession, or samsaric bondage — a state from which consciousness must extricate itself in order to achieve individuation. Here entanglement is predominantly pathological, the antithesis of differentiated selfhood. The second approach, developed most forcefully by Conforti and the field-theoretic tradition, recasts entanglement as the natural consequence of archetypal fields drawing individuals and dyads into shared morphological patterns; on this reading it is neither pathological nor exceptional but structurally inevitable. A third trajectory, represented by von Franz, McGilchrist, and the Pauli–Jung dialogue, projects the phenomenon beyond the clinical dyad entirely, aligning psychic entanglement with quantum nonlocality and synchronicity — modes of acausal, non-spatial connection that implicate matter as much as mind. The tension between these readings — entanglement as obstacle to individuation versus entanglement as index of a deeper unity — constitutes the central interpretive crux the reader must navigate.

In the library 14 passages

Ulysses is the creator-god in Joyce, a true demiurge who has freed himself from entanglement in the physical and mental world and contemplates them with detached consciousness… the higher self who returns to his divine home after blind entanglement in samsara.

Jung frames psychic entanglement as samsaric bondage — a condition of blind immersion in material and mental existence from which the individuating ego must achieve conscious liberation.

Jung, Carl Gustav, The Spirit in Man, Art, and Literature, 1966thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

entanglement(s): in the ego, 302; emotional and intellectual, 28

The Alchemical Studies index distinguishes ego-entanglement from emotional and intellectual entanglement, indicating that Jung regarded the phenomenon as operating across multiple registers of psychic life.

Jung, Carl Gustav, Alchemical Studies, 1967thesis

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Communication is provocative. It disseminates information, reveals the underlying archetypal field of the communicator, and creates a field of influence between the speaker and the listener… the resultant interactions within the system involve a recreation and incarnation of this archetypal morphology.

Conforti reframes psychic entanglement as the natural coupling of individuals within an archetypal field, wherein each communicative act draws participants into a shared morphological enactment.

Conforti, Michael, Field, Form, and Fate: Patterns in Mind, Nature, and Psyche, 1999supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

she is embedded in a field dominated by control and fear. As the field exerts its influence, in much the same manner as does the magnetic hold of a complex or the point attractor in a system, it draws virtually everything within its orbit into its spin, including others.

Conforti characterises psychic entanglement as the magnetic pull of an archetypal field-complex that captures not only the individual but also those in relational proximity, analogous to a dynamical attractor.

Conforti, Michael, Field, Form, and Fate: Patterns in Mind, Nature, and Psyche, 1999supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Nonlocality is, according to Marcelo Gleiser, Professor of Physics at Dartmouth College, ‘an indelible feature of entanglement, and entanglement is an indelible feature of quantum mechanics’… Every part of the cosmos would be necessarily connected in some form to every other part.

McGilchrist invokes quantum nonlocality and entanglement as the physical substrate for a universal connectedness that provides an ontological analogue to psychic entanglement across unbounded distances.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Nonlocality is, according to Marcelo Gleiser, Professor of Physics at Dartmouth College, ‘an indelible feature of entanglement, and entanglement is an indelible feature of quantum mechanics’… Every part of the cosmos would be necessarily connected in some form to every other part.

McGilchrist argues that quantum entanglement, extending into biological and macroscopic systems, supports a holistic ontology in which separation between observer and observed — or between psyches — is fundamentally illusory.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Quantum entanglement could co-ordinate processing in many different parts of the brain simultaneously… it could be the outcome of the observer’s brain and the observed system becoming entangled in consciousness.

McGilchrist proposes that quantum entanglement between observer and observed may be constitutive of consciousness itself, lending a neurophysical dimension to the depth-psychological concept of psychic entanglement.

McGilchrist, Iain, The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World, 2021supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

in the experiment suggested by the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, ‘objects, even if they occupy regions of space very distant from one another, are not really separate.’ In the same way, at the time of certain synchronistic incidents… space seems to disappear.

Von Franz draws a structural parallel between EPR nonlocality and synchronistic psychic phenomena, suggesting that the dissolution of spatial separation is common to both quantum entanglement and moments of acute psychic interconnection.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Psyche and Matter, 2014supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the archetypes are not found exclusively in the psychic sphere, but can occur just as much in circumstances that are not psychic… I would give the name ‘transgressivity,’ because the archetypes… continually go beyond their frame of reference.

Von Franz’s concept of archetypal transgressivity describes the capacity of psychic structures to overstep the boundary between mind and matter, constituting a metaphysical substrate for psychic entanglement with the external world.

von Franz, Marie-Louise, Psyche and Matter, 2014supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

A classical example of a fatal solutio occurs in the story of Hylas… Here the solutio image accompanies a homoerotic entanglement, the attachment between Heracles and Hylas.

Edinger treats erotic entanglement as a variant of the alchemical solutio — a dissolution of ego-boundaries precipitated by intense affective attachment — connecting psychic entanglement to the transformative dangers of Eros.

Edinger, Edward F., Anatomy of the Psyche: Alchemical Symbolism in Psychotherapy, 1985supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

the individual does in fact participate in bringing about his own struggles… beyond these personal, unconscious dynamics lies the archetypal field, which is responsible for the recreation.

Conforti locates psychic entanglement in the compulsive repetition of archetypal field-patterns, distinguishing between personal unconscious participation and the transpersonal field that structurally perpetuates the entanglement.

Conforti, Michael, Field, Form, and Fate: Patterns in Mind, Nature, and Psyche, 1999supporting

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

I had to live it, i.e., it caught hold of me, played the transformation of Mercury on my own human system and gave me incidentally a remarkably miserable fortnight.

Jung’s autobiographical account of being seized by his own research material illustrates the self-involving, entangling power of activated unconscious complexes, even upon the analyst.

Jung, C.G., Letters Volume 1: 1906-1950, 1973aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

archetypal layers of the psyche are, in some sense, fundamental, they tend to produce images and situations which have a tremendous impact on the individual, gripping him and holding him in a grip.

Samuels describes the archetypal grip on the individual as a form of involuntary psychic capture, approximating the entangling hold that activated archetypal images exert upon consciousness.

Samuels, Andrew, Jung and the Post-Jungians, 1985aside

Dig deeper with Sebastian →

Related terms